"yeah, i'm a gamer. five minutes ago i pulled out my dick to an underage character and came so hard my ejaculate hit the mouse button and upvoted that post"
sexual fucking degenerates.
stop jacking off in public, and go hide in the corner to do that shit!
WE DON'T WANT YOUR FUCKING PORN! fucking creepy sexual weirdos whose main dealer is a known pedophile, makes me fucking sick to my stomach
go visit the fucking hentai and loli subs if that's what you want to see, keep it the fuck out of this place.
view the rest of the comments →
frenemy ago
i disagree. it was a bad move down a slippery slope. censorship is censorship.
you have had a justice boner for aged for months. last time you did this shit, putt said it was allowed even if he didn't like it. then you had a nervous breakdown. now it seems that it just takes is putt agreeing that he doesn't like content to get a user banned from a system sub. i think that's a huge step backwards. definitely not in line with the spirit of the site. not unless we are no longer about free speech.
honestly, this whole thing was badly handled.
ex-redd ago
I think u/theoldones is just talking about v/gaming
for what it is worth u/Aged is posting game related -- yet otherwise questionable -- content
theoldones ago
the questionable part is the fucking kicker here.
ex-redd ago
I mean, I guess you could report posts for removal that break rule #7 if you really felt like you needed too
theoldones ago
all those posts he tried to save by marking it as that, had a tendency to be underage characters.
ex-redd ago
this is just a side note: there was a period a bit ago [you no doubt remember] when both loli-posters and anti-loli shills (I am not using "shills" in any sence but the most litteral [many outspoken spamming new accounts] came out of the wood-work in droves.
I honestly think that was an organized ploy to have voat crack-down on free speech via loli much as reddit did with FPH (in reality, the subject/target of loli is like shooting fish in a barrel [the vast majority of Goats don't like that perverted degeneracy]). In-so-doing it would have violated the one foundation of voat [no site-globally prohibited legal speech] and set a slippery-slope prescident (all you need is one exception to kill a maxim: one instance/exception to nullify the universal principle).
Effectively sealing voat.co 's fate
frenemy ago
it would kill the free speech aspect of this site. i would leave if that happened. i'm done getting burned.