You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

PuttItOut ago

I'm glad you made this post now. Because we do need to work to define a new rule about people who disrupt things on purpose.

They abuse the mere fact that we don't typically ban and then shit on everything. Think about the v/aww thing a few months back. That was complete BS.

So how do we phrase this rule?

Broc_Lia ago

I've finally gotten around to having a look at the stuff he posted and honestly I'm wondering what the fuss is all about. They're not even lolis, unless prepubescent girls have D cup breasts now. Also, the only character I actually recognise is an adult ingame.

Was there more stuff that was so bad it had to be deleted and not even show up in the removed submissions log?

Anyhow, at the very most a new sub specific spam rule might be appropriate. Something like "Users may not make more than five posts of the same type per day, with the exception of news articles."

frenemy ago

"No posting sexualised art concerning underage characters,"

the problem with this is who decides if it's sexualised? what if it's original game art that depicts a young looking girl in a skin tight suit? is it porn then? i would point at skullgirls as an example. that rule would make the entire game persona non grata in v/gaming.

Broc_Lia ago

That doesn't look sexualised to me, but I acknowledge that it's a subjective term. I don't think there's a perfectly objective solution here, that one's just a reasonably good one that seems to work well for a lot of other online art communities.

frenemy ago

haha you didn't see the screenshot did you. here you go

that's a bannable offense now.

Broc_Lia ago

Imgoat's cert is expired. Do you still have it saved somewhere?