You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

weezkitty ago

Agreed. Banning someone for "attitude" has no place on Voat. Especially not a perma ban. There is no rule on /v/gaming that says "no attitude"

It should be reversed ASAP.

PoetryPete ago

Yes like if they could give a real reason listed in their sidebar that would be justifiable. Spam? Memes? whatever but not attitude.

freshmeat ago

So you agree that the ban was earned, but the reason doesn't sit right with you?

Take your concern trolling back to Reddit and /r/Politics

PoetryPete ago

I do not agree. Where did I agree that the ban was earned?

freshmeat ago

Yes like if they could give a real reason listed in their sidebar that would be justifiable.

The real reason is they spammed and intentionally antagonized the moderator out of nowhere. You are right that "Attitude" isn't a good description. But you are wrong about the ban being a bad move.

PoetryPete ago

Not intentionally antagonizing the mods is a rule now?! Fuck me I'm in trouble then aren't i?

freshmeat ago

now hen you are doing it by breaking sub rules just to cause drama no one wanted to begin with except flaming faggots because only faggots like drama, like you OP.

PoetryPete ago

That's your SUBJECTIVE judgement that he was breaking rules to cause drama, he coulda just been having a laugh. Maybe if it had been ignored he would get tired of poking the sub and move on to the next giggle.

freshmeat ago

Nah, I don;t think the majority of Voaters want to entertain this sort of faggotry by users like you and Expert.

PoetryPete ago

Faggotry is not against 'The Rules' faggot

freshmeat ago

Some subs have standards, it's up to the mods and the actual community to run it as they see fit, which seemed like no one had a problem until an SBBH user started spamming trying to get banned.