I noticed some of you started equating capitalism (jewish corporate socialism) to free markets when people started pointing out the initial difference.
Ah yes, the thing kikes are actually afraid of is libertarianism, I’m sure that will scare them shitless. You’re just another dime a dozen lolbert dipshit that doesn’t understand that this is real capitalism just like how real communism ends up like the USSR. You make fun of commies for saying not real communism and then turn around and do the same. Delusional idiots.
No, you just fell for the communists language games.
See, thats what I mean by well poisoning.
It starts with the myth of the 'tragedy of the commons'.
I'll let you go research how thats a myth because I'm not gonna spend two hours arguing minutae about that.
In short: systems tend to self regulate. The minute you introduce a single regulation from outside parties, it breaks those systems.
Consequenly, instead of competitors coming together to keep eachother in check, we get a regulatory system in governments. Regulatory systems are just the pre-step to regulatory capture, which leads to monopolies.
This is usually the moment that all this flies over people's heads and they come in with "hurr durr regulations ARENT FREE MARKET!"
And thats also part of the well poisoning because it presupposes that free markets are an exact synonym for "laissez faire capitalism", which it isn't.
But because we've spent so long using "free" and "regulation" (starting with the myth of the tragedy of the commons), they're now antonyms.
But theres definitely a distinction to be drawn:
There are two kinds of 'regulation', same as theres two kinds of 'eugenics'.
effective - that which improves (market) fitness and efficiency, improving stability
and reducing pathologies (monpolism)
pathological - that which lowers efficiency, increases instabality, leads to
monopolism, or general market dysfunction.
As an example I give you the market for devices pre-usb vs the market post-usb.
Government intervention here was number 1 - effective, rather than forcing a particular
solution, it mandated that market competitors come together to agree on one standard
(the commons).
Had the government itself explicitly mandated one particular standard, say because of
regulatory capture, that would have been a pathological case.
We see then what a free market actually is:
Cartels in a regulatory environment where the existence of the competitors keeps
the regulatory environment from favoring any one market member too much.
The market regulates the regulators, the regulators regulate the market.
That is a 'free' market.
It leaves room for new (and old) competitors, simply by the nature of the competition
and the environment that surrounds it.
Capitalism on the otherhand is the rule of those who have capital. Those already in the
market, forming organic and artificial hierarchies of sway and political outcomes
based on market share. It's just communism in disguise, the whol inner circle/outer circle
shtick. Which is why capitalism always collapses under monopolism and reverts to
socialism/communism after impoverishing everyone under jewish financiers.
Capitalism, which should really be called Monopolism, drives out competition, because
jewish bankers and investors see competition as a deadly sin.
Wait, are you saying that Amazon has been operating in the red since literally day 1 and has been continuously forwarding it's debts by injecting a false cash flow in order to facilitate a distribution program designed to obtain sales and customer information from as many merchants as possible so that it can use the information to form its own shell companies that will kill the individual ownerships and give Amazon complete control over the global distribution market, and all while getting away with it by paying massive amounts to lobbyists to legalize the system they are abusing, and those lobbyists work with the same capitalistic entities that have a interest in pushing Jewish propaganda and subversion in an attempt to weaken and destroy the American middle class (eg white people) in order to facilitate a mass over taking of the American empire to funnel global power into the hands of a few unknown abusive individuals that have ties with operations under Epstein to set them up with proof of child abuse to blackmail politicians in order to prevent them from spilling the beans publicly on the globalists plans?
Yeah I said capitalism. Oh wait it’s “not real capitalism” though I forgot. In a perfect world that doesn’t exist the state and market would never mingle and we could have real capitalism finally! Yes retard, this is what happens when power centralizes and is the end result of capitalism.
view the rest of the comments →
1opieson ago
All we have to do is:
Stop
Watching
Their
Shit
BlowjaySimpson ago
Ah yes, the "vote with your dollar" delusional lolbert cope.
Nukeisrael ago
They are literally valueless pussies. They would rather tell you to make your own Amazon than admit their little free market isn’t perfect.
captainstrange ago
I noticed some of you started equating capitalism (jewish corporate socialism) to free markets when people started pointing out the initial difference.
Now I'm sure of it. You are a slimy jew NS.
Nukeisrael ago
Ah yes, the thing kikes are actually afraid of is libertarianism, I’m sure that will scare them shitless. You’re just another dime a dozen lolbert dipshit that doesn’t understand that this is real capitalism just like how real communism ends up like the USSR. You make fun of commies for saying not real communism and then turn around and do the same. Delusional idiots.
captainstrange ago
Ah yes, lets shit the goalposts so you an jew-on-and-on about "muh lolberts".
Yes, this is capitalism.
Which is not the same as free markets.
False Equivalencies between two very different ideas.
Stick your head in an oven you lying jew. You belong in a camp.
BlowjaySimpson ago
Free markets are a fucking retarded globalist ideal.
captainstrange ago
NS gets on his alt to shitpost somemore.
Capitalism is a fucking retarded globalis ideal, same as communism.
Freemarkets are what we had before jewish corporate socialism.
BlowjaySimpson ago
Oh really? When?
In the entire history of the United States, we have never had a "free market".
captainstrange ago
Prior to the federal reserve act. Fiat favors investors over savers.
Savers were the engine of small businesses and the middle class.
And it was around that time we started the transition to jewish financier capitalism.
BlowjaySimpson ago
Even fed pre kiking, we had mad tariffs, you fucking mongoloid.
captainstrange ago
No, you just fell for the communists language games.
See, thats what I mean by well poisoning.
It starts with the myth of the 'tragedy of the commons'.
I'll let you go research how thats a myth because I'm not gonna spend two hours arguing minutae about that.
In short: systems tend to self regulate. The minute you introduce a single regulation from outside parties, it breaks those systems.
Consequenly, instead of competitors coming together to keep eachother in check, we get a regulatory system in governments. Regulatory systems are just the pre-step to regulatory capture, which leads to monopolies.
This is usually the moment that all this flies over people's heads and they come in with "hurr durr regulations ARENT FREE MARKET!"
And thats also part of the well poisoning because it presupposes that free markets are an exact synonym for "laissez faire capitalism", which it isn't.
But because we've spent so long using "free" and "regulation" (starting with the myth of the tragedy of the commons), they're now antonyms.
But theres definitely a distinction to be drawn:
There are two kinds of 'regulation', same as theres two kinds of 'eugenics'.
effective - that which improves (market) fitness and efficiency, improving stability
and reducing pathologies (monpolism)
pathological - that which lowers efficiency, increases instabality, leads to
monopolism, or general market dysfunction.
As an example I give you the market for devices pre-usb vs the market post-usb.
Government intervention here was number 1 - effective, rather than forcing a particular
solution, it mandated that market competitors come together to agree on one standard
(the commons).
Had the government itself explicitly mandated one particular standard, say because of
regulatory capture, that would have been a pathological case.
We see then what a free market actually is:
Cartels in a regulatory environment where the existence of the competitors keeps
the regulatory environment from favoring any one market member too much.
The market regulates the regulators, the regulators regulate the market.
That is a 'free' market.
It leaves room for new (and old) competitors, simply by the nature of the competition
and the environment that surrounds it.
Capitalism on the otherhand is the rule of those who have capital. Those already in the
market, forming organic and artificial hierarchies of sway and political outcomes
based on market share. It's just communism in disguise, the whol inner circle/outer circle
shtick. Which is why capitalism always collapses under monopolism and reverts to
socialism/communism after impoverishing everyone under jewish financiers.
Capitalism, which should really be called Monopolism, drives out competition, because
jewish bankers and investors see competition as a deadly sin.
Glipglup ago
Wait, are you saying that Amazon has been operating in the red since literally day 1 and has been continuously forwarding it's debts by injecting a false cash flow in order to facilitate a distribution program designed to obtain sales and customer information from as many merchants as possible so that it can use the information to form its own shell companies that will kill the individual ownerships and give Amazon complete control over the global distribution market, and all while getting away with it by paying massive amounts to lobbyists to legalize the system they are abusing, and those lobbyists work with the same capitalistic entities that have a interest in pushing Jewish propaganda and subversion in an attempt to weaken and destroy the American middle class (eg white people) in order to facilitate a mass over taking of the American empire to funnel global power into the hands of a few unknown abusive individuals that have ties with operations under Epstein to set them up with proof of child abuse to blackmail politicians in order to prevent them from spilling the beans publicly on the globalists plans?
That just sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory!
1opieson ago
This is making incredibly good sense...
Nukeisrael ago
Yeah I said capitalism. Oh wait it’s “not real capitalism” though I forgot. In a perfect world that doesn’t exist the state and market would never mingle and we could have real capitalism finally! Yes retard, this is what happens when power centralizes and is the end result of capitalism.