You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EIMR ago

I don't like this. This stopped new groups from brigading and taught that downvoting is important, not to be used indiscriminately as a disagree button. I don't see anything good coming from this.

EDIT: @Atko , what will happen with subverses that decide to continue having the CCP Requirement? Will they still be out of v/All?

Atko ago

Multiple subverses had "please upvote me" threads where their members were able to gain 300+ CCP in matter of hours. At the same time, regular users would need MONTHS to reach this level. Don't you see a problem with that?

All subs with minimum CCP requirement will not show up in /v/all. Homer explained it well here.

EIMR ago

I do see a problem with vote manipulation, however, nowadays obtaining CCP is extremely easy. My parent comment has like 130 points at the moment. And if that is 100 CCP is too much, the quantity could be reduced to 50.

And yes, I've read Homer's after my edit and I understand. My main concern is how to discover new subs with restrictions, as I(and possibly many) discover new subs by seeing their posts on All.

Atko ago

We could implement a new /v/all tab for subverses which have minimum CCP requirements and make the discovery easier. I think you're onto something here :)

EIMR ago

Yep, a TrueAll would be interesting. It would be perfect if all subverses were there, even the anonymized.

Atko ago

Agreed.