SCP and CCP no longer play any role in your ability do submit links/start discussions or vote. You can now downvote as soon as you create an account. Please note that you can only vote once from a single IP address (voting IP addresses are stored encrypted and we have no way to reverse this encryption). We are still tweaking this so please report if you notice anything unusual about voting.
Edit: The biggest reason for this change is that I noticed how multiple subverses had "please upvote me" threads where their members were able to gain 300+ CCP in matter of minutes. At the same time, regular users would need weeks or even months to reach this level. That essentially broke the old system and we need something new. Perhaps requiring new accounts to create 100 comments in 100 different subs before being able to vote 100 times? If you have an idea, please feel free to share it, I'm all ears.
Edit 2: Here is an example of the problem I am trying to tackle:
- a large corporation which has hundreds or thousands of employees, comes over to Voat and pushes their advertising links to the frontpage because upvotes are not restricted for new accounts as much as downvotes
- at the same time, majority of Voat users today does not have the ability to downvote or has restricted downvotes
Edit 3: This is now reverted to the way it was. I need to think this through.
view the rest of the comments →
Kleyno ago
Oh Amalek is just going to love this... now he'll never shut up with his spamming.
Edit: @Atko, in light of this change, I humbly request that you guys get the block user feature working pronto. If Amalek and the copy pasta spammers like him can't be stopped with Negative CCP or Submission limits, I want the option to just block their junk outright.
SpaceRosa ago
What good is that? Being able to block him is just averting our eyes. The subverse would still be filled with spam, we just wouldn't see it. New users, and new people who don't have an account yet would though, and that wouldn't be good.
Kleyno ago
It is not our job to get rid of the spam. That is the Moderators job, and eventually auto-mod as well, when that is available.
If I see spam, I'll report it and then make a decision as to whether or not I block the User posting it.
It is then out of my hands.
SpaceRosa ago
You just want to use the website and have someone else keep it nice for you.
Kleyno ago
Well I am a User, after all. What the hell did you think that word meant?
I use the site, I don't maintain it. I don't even have the ability to delete spam posts, as I don't moderate any subs, so I don't really get the point you are trying to make.
SpaceRosa ago
It just seems to me like you want something for nothing. I think if you're going to use the site for free the least you could do is pay enough attention and downvote the spammy garbage instead of averting your eyes and leaving it up to someone else. On another note, you've been on Voat for a month. How the hell does your overview say you have 15131 CPP from just that? That's either a bug or your every comment must be gold.
Kleyno ago
It is not a bug.
SpaceRosa ago
Well, I take back that gold comment then. No way you could get that much in a month without pandering.
Kleyno ago
Do you usually point fingers at people and their CCP scores?
SpaceRosa ago
No, it's just that for a Voat user who's only been here for a month, or in some cases at all, that's an unusually high count. Knowing how Voat can be, I doubt you got it by quality commenting all the time.
LizardBreathe ago
You know that the user profile shows you the top 3 comments, and he just got lucky with wording and timing on a big announcement thread. Almost all of them were from 3 comments.
SpaceRosa ago
Ah, you're right. He even did the annoying edit-to-talk-about-how-successful-the-comment-was thing.
Kleyno ago
People upvoat what they want. I do not demand that they upvoat me. If they like what I post, so be it. If they hate it what I post, so be it.