You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EIMR ago

While it is true that Atko shouldn't have picked a side like this, I disagree, She wasn't a good mod. She was unprofessional and didn't mod well.

Calorie-Kin ago

She made rules (that the community agreed on) and enforced them. How is that a bad mod?

EIMR ago

First, She deleted all submissions without an interrogation sign, even if they were obviously questions, and even if they already had hundreds of comments. Then I also remember a few submissions removed because of "Soapboxing", which were legit posts.

Calorie-Kin ago

Yes, she removed them because they didn't have the question mark. That was the rule, and she enforced it. All users had to do was resubmit the post with one.

CrowTRobot ago

https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/401467

Please find for me the lacking question mark.

Calorie-Kin ago

Wasn't removed for breaking rule 1.

CrowTRobot ago

And it wasn't breaking rule 3 either.

Calorie-Kin ago

It wasn't a question, and it belonged to a meta subverse.

gatordontplaythatsht ago

You mean like the one's srs started on defaults they ran to use against users fighting for positive changes?

CrowTRobot ago

It explicitly asks two questions in the title of the post. No meta posts isn't listed as a rule of the sub, therefore it isn't grounds for deletion.

Calorie-Kin ago

You can keep arguing and downvoting me all you like. It was a meta post, and it belonged to a meta subverse.

CrowTRobot ago

I don't have to downvoat you. Other people have, and I'll give you a screenshot if you want proof. Creating rules in order to justify the deletion of a post (which is what both of you did) is absolutely censorship.