SCP and CCP no longer play any role in your ability do submit links/start discussions or vote. You can now downvote as soon as you create an account. Please note that you can only vote once from a single IP address (voting IP addresses are stored encrypted and we have no way to reverse this encryption). We are still tweaking this so please report if you notice anything unusual about voting.
Edit: The biggest reason for this change is that I noticed how multiple subverses had "please upvote me" threads where their members were able to gain 300+ CCP in matter of minutes. At the same time, regular users would need weeks or even months to reach this level. That essentially broke the old system and we need something new. Perhaps requiring new accounts to create 100 comments in 100 different subs before being able to vote 100 times? If you have an idea, please feel free to share it, I'm all ears.
Edit 2: Here is an example of the problem I am trying to tackle:
- a large corporation which has hundreds or thousands of employees, comes over to Voat and pushes their advertising links to the frontpage because upvotes are not restricted for new accounts as much as downvotes
- at the same time, majority of Voat users today does not have the ability to downvote or has restricted downvotes
Edit 3: This is now reverted to the way it was. I need to think this through.
view the rest of the comments →
EIMR ago
While it is true that Atko shouldn't have picked a side like this, I disagree, She wasn't a good mod. She was unprofessional and didn't mod well.
Calorie-Kin ago
She made rules (that the community agreed on) and enforced them. How is that a bad mod?
EIMR ago
First, She deleted all submissions without an interrogation sign, even if they were obviously questions, and even if they already had hundreds of comments. Then I also remember a few submissions removed because of "Soapboxing", which were legit posts.
Calorie-Kin ago
Yes, she removed them because they didn't have the question mark. That was the rule, and she enforced it. All users had to do was resubmit the post with one.
CrowTRobot ago
https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/401467
Please find for me the lacking question mark.
Calorie-Kin ago
Wasn't removed for breaking rule 1.
CrowTRobot ago
And it wasn't breaking rule 3 either.
Calorie-Kin ago
It wasn't a question, and it belonged to a meta subverse.
gatordontplaythatsht ago
You mean like the one's srs started on defaults they ran to use against users fighting for positive changes?
CrowTRobot ago
It explicitly asks two questions in the title of the post. No meta posts isn't listed as a rule of the sub, therefore it isn't grounds for deletion.
Calorie-Kin ago
You can keep arguing and downvoting me all you like. It was a meta post, and it belonged to a meta subverse.
CrowTRobot ago
I don't have to downvoat you. Other people have, and I'll give you a screenshot if you want proof. Creating rules in order to justify the deletion of a post (which is what both of you did) is absolutely censorship.