I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
FilmMakingShitlord ago
So that unpopular opinion subs can no longer exist?
Feeds_On_Vegans ago
I think that @mcononerson meant community within the scope of the sub. Sub members guiding the sub rather than mod feudalism (I like that term).
What happens in the scope of Voat as a whole (defaults, frontpage, all, etc). Should be admin driven as they feel is best for the site. @Atko has been pretty clear on the intent to let all legal content exist, but also has a need to step in from time to time and make some choices on direction.
FilmMakingShitlord ago
How do you decide who's apart of the community? What's to stop a bunch of Democrats going into /v/Republican and voting in someone they want as a mod? What's to stop SJWs to take over AskVoat by doing the same? Do you really want the masses deciding how every single sub is ran?
Feeds_On_Vegans ago
An excellent point. Voating rights could be established based on SCP/CCP. Enfranchisement only granted to those that have demonstrated participation in the community. That said, I don't know if the underlying SCP/CCP system could be queried to derive the score only from within the sub.
ChillyHellion ago
This right here might be my favorite thing about Voat. Being able to acknowledge when someone with a different perspective raises a good point, and also being able to disagree respectfully when necessary. You're part of what makes Voat great.