You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

FilmMakingShitlord ago

So that unpopular opinion subs can no longer exist?

Feeds_On_Vegans ago

I think that @mcononerson meant community within the scope of the sub. Sub members guiding the sub rather than mod feudalism (I like that term).

What happens in the scope of Voat as a whole (defaults, frontpage, all, etc). Should be admin driven as they feel is best for the site. @Atko has been pretty clear on the intent to let all legal content exist, but also has a need to step in from time to time and make some choices on direction.

FilmMakingShitlord ago

How do you decide who's apart of the community? What's to stop a bunch of Democrats going into /v/Republican and voting in someone they want as a mod? What's to stop SJWs to take over AskVoat by doing the same? Do you really want the masses deciding how every single sub is ran?

Feeds_On_Vegans ago

An excellent point. Voating rights could be established based on SCP/CCP. Enfranchisement only granted to those that have demonstrated participation in the community. That said, I don't know if the underlying SCP/CCP system could be queried to derive the score only from within the sub.

Broc_Lia ago

Trouble is, most genuine users are relatively laid back and won't have huge CCP. The powerusers are much more likely to be censor happy activists. Plus, it's really easy to game CCP if that's what's at stake.

FilmMakingShitlord ago

The problem is, it's not hard to get CCP, just circle jerk.

ChillyHellion ago

An excellent point.

This right here might be my favorite thing about Voat. Being able to acknowledge when someone with a different perspective raises a good point, and also being able to disagree respectfully when necessary. You're part of what makes Voat great.