I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
FitMachoNaziAtheist ago
Went back to reddit, voat is no different.
Atko ago
I wasn't aware that it was abandoned. Thanks, I'll discuss it with @puttitout.
Krael ago
Does nobody else see the irony of Voat considering an outright hostile admin takeover of a sub?
The head moderator disappeared. Ok, pick one of the active mods to take over. Problem 1 is solved. You don't like how they're approaching the situation? Delist them as a default. Problem 2 solved.
Kicking them out of what is unarguably their subverse sets a really fucking bad precedent, in my opinion. What happens next? You disagree with how I'm running /v/Skyforge and I suddenly find myself taken off the modlist? If someone has a different idea for how a subverse should be handled, they can make their own. Isn't that the entire point of subverses in the first place?
EDIT: Seems my radical suggestion of "don't steal subverses from people" turned out to be a little controversial.
synergy ago
he de-listed it from default he didn't steal it.
Krael ago
You're the second person who didn't read the two comments above mine. Please read them again.
synergy ago
no I read it. It's not a hostile admin take over. And no they don't "own" the sub, the community does.
Krael ago
Someone recommended a hostile takeover. Atko said him and Putt would discuss it. This thread started as a direct response to the comment by Atko.
Read them again, please.
synergy ago
no one recommended a hostile takeover they said the sub was abandoned and that's when he said he'll look into it.
Krael ago
Read.
It.
Again.
synergy ago
yes I did read it I think you're the one who needs to read it again. it has no owner right now, there are mods but no owner. it said assign new owners, atko can give it to the current mods if he decides to or even someone else. The owner of the sub has been MIA for a month+