You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Free_Radical ago

What am I missing here?

This is a text-based platform. Bandwidth wise, it's the cheapest possible solution per user - by far. Traditional websites, forums or imageboards are wasting infinitely more per eyeball (loading images and other media) and still managing to survive and make profit. They are happy when numbers spike because they found a way to actually make profit from eyeballs. Only Voat seems to get Shoah'd every time a growth opportunity presents itself. It's completely nonsensical. If you are making a loss with the current population - which is what you're saying - more users would only make it worse. Voat users, for some inexplicable reason, carry a negative value.

The investor conundrum also doesn't make sense. Surely, some of them could be persuaded to invest for a percentage of profits without getting any additional policy rights.