I am not a big fan of corporate fluffy words. I think most of you are adults and should be treated as such, so, I’ll be straightforward with you: We have to start generating revenue if we are to keep Voat running, open, and free.
Your generous donations have helped keep Voat afloat (and at times brought tears in my eyes) for far too long (looking back, I can’t believe I purchased voat.co domain back in 2014), and both me and @PuttItOut have agreed that asking for donations is not something we want to keep doing; It just doesn’t feel right. Voat was originally a side-project and I think that Voat has turned into something pretty damn amazing. As of March 2016, Voat had a total of 309.960 registered user accounts, over 800.000 unique monthly visitors, 125.281.033 requests, transferred 913 GB of data/month, a total of 918.886 submissions, 9.784.388 submission votes, 4.724.905 comments and 13.574.029 comment votes.
Voat has been mentioned in Wired UK, Business Insider, Time, The Verge, Marketwatch, International Business Times, Ilta-Sanomat, Washington Post, Forbes, The Guardian, Vice Motherboard, Le Monde, The Independent, Venturebeat, Mashable, BBC, Coin Telegraph, The Christian Science Monitor, Fortune, Daily Dot, CNET, Engadget… We have had interview requests from Bloomberg TV, Swiss national TV, BBC and about 30 other, all of which we’ve declined because we had to work hard to bring Voat back online and keep it running. Running and maintaining Voat takes time, a lot of time.
We also received a ton of inquiries from investors, but for what it’s worth, we never accepted any offers as most investors simply didn’t share our vision.
So, what is our ultimate goal and the point of this announcement? We want to be able to work full time on Voat. We love Voat, we love doing what we do and we want to focus all of our energy on Voat. We’ve spent a lot of time writing a new Voat API which will eventually help replace all existing logic and open the door to 3rd party developers to create fully functional mobile applications as well as allow us to implement new & meaningful features. This effort will also help us bring the costs of hosting Voat down, way down, but we don’t think that it will be possible to go lower than 5k/month in operating costs in the near future. We think there is a lot of room for improvement and innovation (we have a bunch of really weird ideas) and we’d love dedicate our attention full time to Voat and this community.
To this end, we will start selling sidebar ad space. Our ad criteria are very strict. Ads cannot have animations, ads cannot embed 3rd party scripts. We will not track ad impressions and we won’t track clicks on the ads. We will offer 2 types of ads: site-wide default ads, and single subverse ads. Demand will dictate the pricing. For more information about advertising on Voat visit https://voat.co/advertize
As a courtesy to everyone who donated, we will allow you to turn-off ads in your user preferences (pending a software update), but of course you are always free to block our ads.
So, what do you guys think? Are we doing the right thing?
view the rest of the comments →
psymin ago
I think that this is a reasonable ad policy.
RumbledFeathers ago
I don't really mind ads. I'm more worried about the site remaining a platform for free speech, no matter how offensive and that you guys aren't stressed out running the site.
InfoTeddy ago
The only thing I don’t like about ads is how advertisers force the platform to deliver a certain message, because the platform’s costs happen to largely depend on the advertisers. If the platform has said a message the advertiser doesn’t like, the advertiser can simply threaten to stop paying the platform unless the platform takes that message down.
mukt ago
This is exactly the reason Atko gave to refuse ads on Voat about an year ago.
How things change!
a_random_sith ago
I think ads are reasonable but as @InfoTeddy said, advertisers may want to push a message or not be seen next to certain subverses. For example, an ad for alcohol and an ad for pregnancy tests probably wouldn't send the right message on the /v/jailbaitanon sub. Just examples but you see what I'm saying.
White_Raven ago
Ads come to your screen from different URLs than the one you want to look at (this is why adblockers work).
The more URLs you are accessing at once, the slower the thing you want to look at loads.
I've watched ghostery block as many as 30 URLs at once - for ONE site.
These ad services don't care what they are linking, just that each view earns them money - so malware and other harmful shit makes its way into some of these ads.
Ads cost bandwidth, and ergo speed. Why should I dedicate some of what I pay for to someone elses income stream?
InfoTeddy ago
Because some people are too lazy to get jobs, that’s why.