You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

psymin ago

I think that this is a reasonable ad policy.

RumbledFeathers ago

I don't really mind ads. I'm more worried about the site remaining a platform for free speech, no matter how offensive and that you guys aren't stressed out running the site.

InfoTeddy ago

The only thing I don’t like about ads is how advertisers force the platform to deliver a certain message, because the platform’s costs happen to largely depend on the advertisers. If the platform has said a message the advertiser doesn’t like, the advertiser can simply threaten to stop paying the platform unless the platform takes that message down.

mukt ago

This is exactly the reason Atko gave to refuse ads on Voat about an year ago.
How things change!

a_random_sith ago

I think ads are reasonable but as @InfoTeddy said, advertisers may want to push a message or not be seen next to certain subverses. For example, an ad for alcohol and an ad for pregnancy tests probably wouldn't send the right message on the /v/jailbaitanon sub. Just examples but you see what I'm saying.

White_Raven ago

Ads come to your screen from different URLs than the one you want to look at (this is why adblockers work).

The more URLs you are accessing at once, the slower the thing you want to look at loads.

I've watched ghostery block as many as 30 URLs at once - for ONE site.

These ad services don't care what they are linking, just that each view earns them money - so malware and other harmful shit makes its way into some of these ads.

Ads cost bandwidth, and ergo speed. Why should I dedicate some of what I pay for to someone elses income stream?

InfoTeddy ago

Because some people are too lazy to get jobs, that’s why.