A local politician has sicced the police on me (YellowVestsCanada)

submitted ago by 2913574?

A certain transvestite politician, who helped to change the laws in Canada about sex reassignment, legal changes that enable pedophiles/predators like Jonathan "Jessica" Yaniv to get away with sexually assaulting females with impugnity, has set the full wait of the police against me to stifle my free speech.

I'm not going to mention who this politician is or what province I'm in, but if you figure out who it is anyways, please don't contact this person on my behalf. The reason I ask, is because he "interprets" my academic critique of his ideology and its consequences as "intimidating" and the police have warned me that if I communicate directly or indirectly with this person, I will be charged with harassment.

This politician has a history of litigiousness and censorship to stifle his critics and political opponents. With his instigation and tattle-taling, he has gotten people kicked off of websites, out of schools, charged with criminal offenses, taken to tribunals, fired from their jobs, and otherwise silenced.

He is motivated to take away your means of making a living. And your means of expressing your free speech.

Surely, I say to you, he deserves the guillotine. But let us not send him to Hell, for in this passive-aggressive tyrrany, that would only aid his allies and hinder your own (cf. "When you kill your enemies, they win" -J Trudeau). Instead, let us play smart, and let him speak himself into obsurdity, and when the people are sick of him, we will be graduating with our professional degrees and retaking our institutions.

I guess the Gauche Wing has proven itself untrustworthy with power.

15762862? ago

https://voat.co/u/TheNerdyCowboy I urge you to go to your subverse settings and change the "Anonymized mode" (yes/no/both) to no. This denies any more anon posts on the subverse.

15763347? ago

Nice try. Trying to get me to dox myself so you can charge me with harrassment? You're the one who is harassing me, you ogre.

15763418? ago

Dox an alias? Really? Are you the one "spanking" me?

The harrassment angle hadn't occurred to me, thanks!

15763482? ago

We know know you know of at least one example of various online aliases being dossiered together with real world identities.

15763585? ago

SOP

It is hypocrites like you that should be exposed in all their glory.

BTW how did you manage to connect this anon post to the target of your spanking?

15763766? ago

I will neither confirm nor deny any phishing attempts, you fucking troon.

15763870? ago

What you are doing is helping me to convince the mod here to turn of anon posts. Much appreciated.

What, finally figgered out that downvoting anon posts is pointless, you fucking hypocritical loon?

15764038? ago

And here we see the strategy laid bare once more: pick and pick and pick, instigate instigate, and when you get the response you're looking for go and tattle to whoever has the power to silence the person you want silenced.

Let this be an example for all viewers.

15764883? ago

You keep coming back, continue to downvote (even though you know it's pointless).

Cowardly anonymous hypocritical fucking loon.

Here's an idea. Fuck off with your spankings. Tattle? To whom would I direct that?

15765352? ago

If you are the anon that started this thread then I owe you a sincere apology.

None of this was directed at you, and there was no intent of doxxing you in real life. I have been chased all over Voat getting downvoted in a attempt to silence me. I started this in a different post, as I have been downvoted enough I can only reply to existing comments.

Please note the timestamps are half an hour apart, and the other post shows 2 downvotes from the actual target of my ire, they have been downvoting every comment I make, and there may be two of them doing this.

I asked earlier if you were the one "spanking" me but got a response that made me think you were the one chasing me all over Voat. I did not connect your "you ogre" statement immediately with your real and actual problems IRL until I read this comment which referred to some politician by name.

I asked again "BTW how did you manage to connect this anon post to the target of your spanking?"

Again your response seemed ambivalent, but that's no excuse.

I made an assumption, that you were not the one that started this thread but the one chasing me around.

That was wrong of me. I am very sorry if this has stressed you out needlessly, the last thing I would want to do is to add to your troubles. The last word is yours, I will no longer respond on this thread.

15687895? ago

Speak himself into obscurity?

The time for violent revolution has long since come and passed.

15582184? ago

Is this politician Jewish? Certainly sounds like it.

15582161? ago

But crybullies are victims too!

15581925? ago

This submission was linked from this v/BloodOfEurope submission by @theoldones.

Posted automatically (#13870) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

15581766? ago

give us some clues.

area.

party.

etc.

15582520? ago

I would guess OP is talking about Rogaine Ogre.

15582622? ago

This comment was linked from this v/BloodOfEurope comment by @theoldones.

Posted automatically (#13876) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

15581675? ago

You will not be silenced here

15582357? ago

Lesbian transsexuals are a mathematical impossibility.

1.7% — The percentage of Canadians aged 18 to 59 who reported in 2014 that they consider themselves to be homosexual (gay or lesbian). 1.3% — The percentage of Canadians aged 18 to 59 who reported in 2014 that they consider themselves to be bisexual.

https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/dai/smr08/2015/smr08_203_2015#a3

The prevalence figures reported in these ten studies range from 1:11,900 to 1:45,000 for male-to-female individuals (MtF) and 1:30,400 to 1:200,000 for female-to-male (FtM) individuals.

https://www.wpath.org/publications/soc

Almost three percent (2.8%) of men and 0.4% of women reported at least one episode of transvestic fetishism.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15859369/

Now, let's do the math.

1.7% of the population is gay. 1.3% is bi, which is also gay. So let's call it 3%.

Between 1/11,900 and 1/45,000 males becomes transsexual. Let's call it 1/30,000, as that is the number cited in common knowledge amongst physicians. So that's 0.003...%.

So only 3% of 0.003...% of the population should be a lesbian transsexual, or 0.0001%.

If you meet a "lesbian transsexual", chances are you are actually meeting a heterosexual transvestite who is malingering as a transsexual for his own autogynephilic reasons.

Occam's Razor, or the "law of parsimony" is the problem-solving principle that the simplest solution tends to be the correct one. When presented with competing hypotheses to solve a problem, one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions.

Which is the simplest solution? That all these lesbian transvestites (notice how they outnumber the straight ones?) are bucking the statistical predictions in astronomical numbers? Or that the 2.7% prevalence of fetishistic crossdressers accounts for this population?

15583467? ago

0.000001x30000000ish= 30. There should be approximately 30sh in canada