You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

blumen4alles ago

Nice logo change.

Putt we have a few domains to ban please. We are being drowned in spam. Now I said that I will go read what you wrote :)

I hope this isn't the FEDS playing an April Fools joke. Great to hear from you!

Lamp_shade ago

Yeah this. Ban the qtards and i might believe that this is someone other than agent shekelstein from the fbi.

twistedmac11 ago

That would go against Voat's premise of free speech. If we go around banning people we don't agree with or like, we all become like crensch. Dont become like crensch. Try to get the qtards to wake up so they can put all that energy towards something worthwhile.

Lamp_shade ago

Free speech is fine. Free spam is not. There is a difference, even if youre too stupid to realize it.

twistedmac11 ago

Spam isn't just a catch-all term for anything you don't agree with. An example of spam would be the random sleeper accounts making link posts for allforfunlife.com. That's spam. Most of what the qtards post isn't literal spam, you just don't agree with it. So, again, we can't just go around banning what we don't agree with. That's a slippery slope.

DanijelStark ago

"Oy vey , were not kikes at all - shut this subverse down , Putt ! "

The hypocrisy is strong within those who pretend like they "own" the VOAT - and if theyre not kikebots themselves , then theyre definitely behaving the same .

People can agree or disagree ... but calling to shut down what some faggots here dont like is a typical kikery . Why not simply block and not comment anymore on such subverses that people do not like ? Why the need to comment on them ? There is only one obvious reason ...