You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

GoldIsRealMoney ago

I'm familiar with your stack, but I don't really trust voat not to be a honeypot.

PuttItOut ago

What kind of person uses a platform they don't trust? Genuinely asking.

d3r ago

all of /r/conspiracy

GoldIsRealMoney ago

There isn't an alternative for news/thought aggregating that doesn't stink of rats. I like voat, but I don't want to tie my name and career to it in an industry where nearly every employer has a nose the size of Texas. I'd contribute if you open sourced all or some of the front end, though

whisky_cat ago

I was wondering about the Voat API that's been floated around, that seemingly was built to some extent.

If the API is robust enough, any of us UI folk could build a frontend EZ PZ. I have no idea what the state of that API is, or how to get access (obv I could hit up voatdev and ask).

I'm fully remote/UIE but my current gig isn't something I'll be leaving any time soon.

GoldIsRealMoney ago

Even without a nice API it'd be possible to mock the actual voat endpoints and build a front end for it that could be dropped in at Putt's leisure

CheeseboogerHimself ago

I 100% agree with this.

exopharrah ago

Seriously, he needs to open source this. There are plenty of devs on here that I'm sure would be down to tackle issues and submit PRs (anonymously!) in their spare time for bounties/free depending on the size of issue, but I doubt there are many that would want to tie their livelihood to this.

GoldIsRealMoney ago

Open sourcing the backend would be bad. It would expose potential vulnerabilities. The frontend, however, is already public information