You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0100100-100110 ago

Sounds like somebody could weaponize the ban process to get people banned who they dont like.

Not sure how the computer code shit works, but maybe a strike system.

1)"FIRST STRIKE" Punishment: Automatic Ban, Appeal Process: Given automatically upon request/ with generic warning inboxed (reduce's admin cost of somebody manually reading appeal shit)

2)"SECOND STIKE" Punishment: Automatic Ban, Appeal Process: Given automatically upon request 3-5 day ban. (just incase some guy some how got fucked by the system once, he is only fucked for 3-5 days. This may also encourage a user to reach out for help to get his shit unfucked, gives admin time to figure out how this goat got fucked and where the system needs improvment at the admins convenience)

3)"THIRD STRIKE" COMPLETE BAN Appeal Process: Must message admin to get unbanned (somebody has to read this shit) But if the system works right 99.99% of these bans would be legit.

0100100-100110 ago

They should also have to write during the "Appeal Process" a reason why they got banned, or what they think may have happened. That way when ever admin does have to review a 2nd or 3rd strike they may have a little info on previous situations.

captainstrange ago

They should also have to write during the "Appeal Process" a reason why they got banned

Gay ass reddit-tier faggotry.

0100100-100110 ago

It cuts down on administration cost, so you dont have an individual manually reviewing each ban. Appeals would be instant, almost as soon as you send the request (or delayed depending on how the code is written). I don't know how reddit works, never been over there but the only moderater needed for this would be for third strike appeals.