You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Majorfatboy ago

You guys have better ideas anyways, so how should we do this? What should the process be?

Again, whatever the process is, it shouldn't be automated. We're human beings. Yes, even the wehraboo geeks I come here to rip on, They count too. You want to ban users for, well, whatever criteria You can come up with? Fine, but being a script kiddy and making an automated process do it is fucking gay. Sit You ass down at Your computer, appoint some additional mods/admins/jannys/goat herders, and have actual humans research each case. Have a human being actually read a report, look into the accused user's history, check IP addresses, Etc, then make a call.

Honestly, the way You handled the QRVfags is a good example; A load of complaints came in about a certain sub, You investigated, saw some possible faggotry, and then You did the best first step: You contacted that user and talked to them politely. "Sup bro. Getting a bunch of complaints about X, here's My thoughts on that, what do You think/Can You fuck off with that shit before I smack Your ass?

This is how it's done.

Automate this shit, and You're going to hear screeching like nothing before. Have humans do it, and You'll get some screeching, just a lot less.

Also: Knock it off with the gay fucking cryptic, holier than thou poem posting, You sound like a fairy boy. You see Your post here? That's good. Just fucking say what's on Your mind, I can respect that.

Dsonophorus ago

It should be automated, but it should include human peers in jury.