Today we banned vote manipulators and reset their votes. As cache expires, the accounts targeted will have their point totals adjusted appropriately.
You will likely recognize many of the names now on the ban list. Some I have mixed feelings about as I considered them fun to have around or an asset to Voat as a whole, but objectively, there was no question as to their abuse and manipulation, and for this reason we had no choice but to respond to all abuse with the ban hammer.
@Cynabuns and I have finalized a new system for more efficient processing of vote manipulation bans and going forward we will be reviewing manipulation more regularly. We don't plan on allowing the hammer to gather dust any longer.
We did not send warnings today like we usually do for those in the gray area. If we come across your name again, you will be banned. Fair warning. It's not worth it.
If you feel you have been targeted by vote manipulation please PM me so I can research as we are dealing with a mountain of data when reviewing bans.
To those banned:
I personally don't judge your actions, but you know as well as I do what you were doing. Vote manipulation can not continue going unchecked and for the sake of integrity you got the hammer. If you want to create a new account and forgo the manipulation, you are welcome back. If not, I'll ban you again (and again and again). The thing you don't realize is when I ban you, I am resetting your votes against your target(s), so there is no point in continuing with these ways.
P.S. Now vote manipulators get a shiny new badge so everyone knows that they've been bad little goats. :)
P.P.S. The ban reasons in the ban log are wonky because if a user had multiple infractions, we only used the first description. In addition, the target in the description may be the banned user (which doesn't make sense) as many of these bans resulted in both users (vote farmers) being banned and the code simply reused the same description for each ban.
Banned user log:
https://voat.co/log/banned/user
view the rest of the comments β
srayzie ago
@Uk_Bloke_Awoke! π
@Shizy look!
UK_Bloke_Surprised ago
Well I was more surprised than you were.
I only had one account in use, though I left in place the first one registered because I soon realized it would have doxed me. I stopped using it straight away.
I have never had multiple alts and have never upvoted myself in any way...
I have made over 10,000 more upvotes than downvotes.... and over 6,000 CCP, and I think peopke seem to like my presence, except the shills maybe...
I downvote people who are anti Q or anti Trump and those who make nasty comments... I guess that would sometimes mean all their comments, but in my five months I've never seen any rule about what I could downvote. This is my first and only site of this type, so I have no previous experience...
The ban log says I did a minus 1 downvote for a user named '137' but that user is on this list too, so I guess I was right to downvote them.
I'm glad @PuttItOut has taken steps to stop the multiple alt upvote and downvoting, but feel I am innocent here...
@srayzie @Shizy
srayzie ago
Well you need to be a good boy now lol.
UK_Bloke_Surprised ago
Not how I feel...
srayzie ago
Yeah I agree. @Puttitout @UK_Bloke_Awoke might have been a mistake? Heβs never been anything but helpful that I have noticed.
DickTick ago
If you really didn't then msg putt. He's already fixed one mistake. Either way dude, glad you're back.
UK_Bloke_Surprised ago
π Thx Dick
srayzie ago
I was just playing.
UK_Bloke_Surprised ago
Understood.
I had a coffee and feeling better now π
srayzie ago
Oh good. Haha
SeanBox ago
oh, sanegoat... Does it hurt to know I'm the iron fist?