Today we banned vote manipulators and reset their votes. As cache expires, the accounts targeted will have their point totals adjusted appropriately.
You will likely recognize many of the names now on the ban list. Some I have mixed feelings about as I considered them fun to have around or an asset to Voat as a whole, but objectively, there was no question as to their abuse and manipulation, and for this reason we had no choice but to respond to all abuse with the ban hammer.
@Cynabuns and I have finalized a new system for more efficient processing of vote manipulation bans and going forward we will be reviewing manipulation more regularly. We don't plan on allowing the hammer to gather dust any longer.
We did not send warnings today like we usually do for those in the gray area. If we come across your name again, you will be banned. Fair warning. It's not worth it.
If you feel you have been targeted by vote manipulation please PM me so I can research as we are dealing with a mountain of data when reviewing bans.
To those banned:
I personally don't judge your actions, but you know as well as I do what you were doing. Vote manipulation can not continue going unchecked and for the sake of integrity you got the hammer. If you want to create a new account and forgo the manipulation, you are welcome back. If not, I'll ban you again (and again and again). The thing you don't realize is when I ban you, I am resetting your votes against your target(s), so there is no point in continuing with these ways.
P.S. Now vote manipulators get a shiny new badge so everyone knows that they've been bad little goats. :)
P.P.S. The ban reasons in the ban log are wonky because if a user had multiple infractions, we only used the first description. In addition, the target in the description may be the banned user (which doesn't make sense) as many of these bans resulted in both users (vote farmers) being banned and the code simply reused the same description for each ban.
Banned user log:
https://voat.co/log/banned/user
view the rest of the comments →
17057018? ago
Does this mean @dial_indicator got kicked off too?
Zacchaeus ago
Check their account. They got the badge. Winner winner chicken dinner.
17057410? ago
I saw! Holy shit and he told us all he had Putts blessing to do what he was doing roflmao.
Zacchaeus ago
@puttitout has sold out a long time ago. Those banned were just normal people trying to use voat, who were targetted by shills downvoat brigading. They did what they had to do to keep their ccp from getting shilled to the negatives. I don't think real users care about fake internet points, but the shills were getting tired of clicking downvoat I guess and complained to putt enough.
17058058? ago
Sure.
Zacchaeus ago
Yeah you sure do look like a legit normal user! 1265 submissions to Wildlife
856 submissions to SoapboxBanhammer
411 submissions to ShitPostLitterBox
272 submissions to OrgasMenEverywhere
111 submissions to pics
This user has so far shared a total of 3472 links, started a total of 268 discussions and submitted a total of 12013 comments.
17058119? ago
@puttitout ya should have banned me. I ain't a legit user.
Is cuz Ima cat. Meow!
Inaminit ago
@KatHarzso
17060199? ago
Reported for doxxing!!!
Inaminit ago
Arrgh! Foiled again!
17060283? ago
Something something this is libel. Something about questionable legality in Delaware.
Inaminit ago
Steer clear of the fish, but the chowder is fine...