Today we banned vote manipulators and reset their votes. As cache expires, the accounts targeted will have their point totals adjusted appropriately.
You will likely recognize many of the names now on the ban list. Some I have mixed feelings about as I considered them fun to have around or an asset to Voat as a whole, but objectively, there was no question as to their abuse and manipulation, and for this reason we had no choice but to respond to all abuse with the ban hammer.
@Cynabuns and I have finalized a new system for more efficient processing of vote manipulation bans and going forward we will be reviewing manipulation more regularly. We don't plan on allowing the hammer to gather dust any longer.
We did not send warnings today like we usually do for those in the gray area. If we come across your name again, you will be banned. Fair warning. It's not worth it.
If you feel you have been targeted by vote manipulation please PM me so I can research as we are dealing with a mountain of data when reviewing bans.
To those banned:
I personally don't judge your actions, but you know as well as I do what you were doing. Vote manipulation can not continue going unchecked and for the sake of integrity you got the hammer. If you want to create a new account and forgo the manipulation, you are welcome back. If not, I'll ban you again (and again and again). The thing you don't realize is when I ban you, I am resetting your votes against your target(s), so there is no point in continuing with these ways.
P.S. Now vote manipulators get a shiny new badge so everyone knows that they've been bad little goats. :)
P.P.S. The ban reasons in the ban log are wonky because if a user had multiple infractions, we only used the first description. In addition, the target in the description may be the banned user (which doesn't make sense) as many of these bans resulted in both users (vote farmers) being banned and the code simply reused the same description for each ban.
Banned user log:
https://voat.co/log/banned/user
view the rest of the comments β
TheBuddha ago
LOL
I wonder how many were @dial_indicator? I wonder what his next name will be?
CognitiveDissident5 ago
He's already back as 829834uiasdf
SeanBox ago
sanegoat is hurt right now. right in the feefees. I called this
Hysterics7787 ago
Oh yeah, ignore the fact that nearly half the banned users were actually from v/SoapBoxBanHammer and try to redirect the cause of it all onto SaneGoat hey? Nice. Fucking. Try.
Shizy ago
Nice sleeper account you got here. It looks good on you!
Hysterics7787 ago
Again you're ignoring the fact that a good portion of the banned users were from v/SoapBoxBanHammer and you're now using common shill tactics to instead try to undermine that fact by attacking my integrity as an individual.
Shizy ago
I saw a few SBBH names on that list. I could have missed some since I don't hang out on those subs. If your saying a good portion are from SBBH then list the names you're saying are those users and prove your claim with facts
Common shill tactic? Nice deflection from the fact that you're using a damn sleeper account! So sorry I called attention to your scam π
Hysterics7787 ago
Regarding the 18, how fucking lazy are you? It takes less than a minute to check the ban logs. I explained that the 18 included their offshoot subverses, because as we all know there are several SBBH subverses. I included v/ShitpostersTavern for instance because it is a tiny subverse owned by ExpertShitposter and everyone posting there are SBBH flunkies.
You spent more time responding than it would have taken you to check for yourself...
Shizy ago
π€£ππ€£π that's hysterical coming from the dumbfuck who was so lazy his account could be spotted as a sleeper after only two minutes of checking your history!
Hysterics7787 ago
So does that change the fact that 18 of them were banned? Nope.
SeanBox ago
i've been calling fucking sanegoat out trying to infiltrate SBBH this whole time. aren't you listening? check my post history
drstrangegov ago
this seems significant, i'll be buggered if I can make heads or tails of it.
Hysterics7787 ago
Why in the ever living fuck would I waste time looking through your post history when I wouldn't even know what I was looking for? Especially when, if you weren't completely full of shit, you could easily link me to those threads.
So you were calling out Dial this whole time? No. You weren't. I'm sure you made noise about SaneGoat, that seems like mandatory behavior for you SoapBoxCultists.
TheBuddha ago
I'm pretty sure that means your Q.
SeanBox ago
Trufe
TheBuddha ago
pours one out for his homie
SeanBox ago
Me: Puts a cup underneath the pour so it doesnβt waste it...