You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

robot7247 ago

The preceding L1A1 (UK built FN FAL) did however have long service career, nearly 40 years before the L85 replaced it in 1985. The Brits did not jump onto the small caliber bandwagon with any enthusiasm. The didn't even start on small caliber development until the mid-60s as they liked the L1A1. And, 7.62 NATO made sense when they adopted it (1950s) as the USA was transitioning to 7.62 NATO. (Same for Germany, Scandi countries, & Spain with their G3 variants.) But they had some whopping design oopsies on the L85A2. Amazing for a rifle with nearly 15 years of development before adoption-

the plastic furniture was melted by insect repellent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA80#Design_flaws

clamhurt_legbeard ago

better to say didnt restart on small caliber as they were doing 4.5 mm things in the 50s with the em2 adopted in 1951

theyd been going back and forth on bullpups and small calibers for a while

robot7247 ago

I thought the EM2 was .280 (~7mm)?

clamhurt_legbeard ago

it was in a number of different calibers during development

and at this point it might be blurring in my head a little

but they kept going back to a bullpup idea and kept going back to very small calibers multiple times over a couple generations

heres an example of a 4.85 mm cartridge they tried in the sa80 system

robot7247 ago

One link leads to another but this one tells the tale -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.280_British#After_.280