You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Demonmaus ago

I'm sitting at 253 CCP and haven't hit a downvoat limit yet, but to be honest I don't really downvoat a lot so I'd have a tough time saying.

KL1 ago

A download limit would be in the form of a certain number of downvoats per 24 hours. It will not be tied to how much CCP total above 100 you have.

Speaking of downvoats and CCP, there was a very good suggestion, presented at /v/ideasforvoat some time ago, to give downvoats a 'cost' by making it substract from your own CCP. It will not prevent people from downvoating, but will make them use that 'asset' more wisely. It would also encourage more discussion since people who decide to use a downvoat would be compelled to say why they did it in a reply comment.

omegletrollz ago

I find it really really weird having rules for downvotes that are different than the rules for upvotes. They are exactly the same functionality. Why should there be any more barriers to expressing a negative view than a positive view?

in order to be able to downvoat at all, user must have a higher upvoated to downvoated ratio.

I am absolutely against this sort of thing. Why should I be mathematically enforced to express positive opinions more than negative opinions? This is really the sort of thing a website like this should try to avoid since it is an arbitrary rule that ultimately defines the entire score system.

I am not mad :P I just feel very strongly about this. It's a form of ingrained censorship and offers no real advantage as far as I can see. Isn't the Voat CCP system enough in terms of catching vandalism?

SnuffyThePunk ago

I don't think it's a form of censorship.

This design would make it so that in order to express your view at all by up/downgoating, you must be an active member of the larger community, which makes sense to me.