Why would someone wanting to compromise, modify, or fake emails include hints of pedophilia this way? To distract us from what? These emails only make Hillary look worse!

Things I think the Hillary camp consider worse than a global pedophile ring with thousands of child-victims of human trafficking tied to a non-vital staff member:

Regional wars with tens- and hundreds of thousands dead, billions of dollars in dissapeared money, millions of people displaced, tens of thousands childrens missing, industrialized corruption and pay-to-play realpolitic bastardization tied directly to the Clinton Fundation.

But that's just my 2 euro cents.

Definitely sounds like code to me.

As a person who habitually uses codewords in relation with illegal activity, I would say these are most certainly codes. I can also say that what they've chosen as topic is there to create plausible deniability. What ever the code words means, he still is a enthusiast cook who makes a lot of pasta. His brother still has a pizza oven on his patio.

It's set up to be unprovable.

That said, there just isn't any conclusive evidence at the end of it.

With all the digging that has been done the last few weeks I have to agree with you.

We're way beyond looking for evidence in the mails at this time; we're looking for circumstancial evidence on the wider net. It means that they found no smoking Pizza gun and it most likely will never be found amongst that batch of WikiLeaks.

As for motive? I'm trying not to guess. Red herring?

I can guess, and yes - It's a red herring.

After how things played out at the Equadorian embassy I see no point in considering Assange alive, unharmed or free until WikiLeaks give definite proof of life. That indicates a hostile takeover of WikiLeaks and thus having the opposition controling the intelligence flow.

Until Assange is proven alive I will consider the leaks after the 15th of October to be compromized. There have been very little of worth after that date, and what we do see is interpreted as pedo pointers.

If we were to look at the pedo chain in it self, I would say that Bill C. taking 20 publicly registered trips on the Lolita Express to a convicted pedo's private island where young girls have publicly claimed to be held captive is a better trail to follow.

But instead we dig further on sources we can't even verify anymore...

Back to your original statement;

There's no way you guys are this dumb. You guys don't really believe this pizzagate shit, right?

Belief doesn't matter, proof does. Unfortunately I think we're in a dead end when it comes to evidence so digging further on this trail is detrimental to anybody wanting to expose the Clinton's and CGI or expose a pedo network.