You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

25355825? ago

If a reasonable person under attack believes that he is in danger of death or grave bodily harm, then the use of lethal force for self defense is justified.

25355859? ago

Not if that person knowingly puts themselves in a dangerous situation. Not if that person traveled across state lines with intent to be deputized with a group of armed people. Doesn't look like self defense at all, it looks like this outcome was the intent all along.

25355902? ago

He was deputized by God, and did God's work.

25355933? ago

You mean the work of foreign agitators looking to destabilize the country

CHINA & SOROS would love to see more violence

25361805? ago

Suddenly ^jew^ doesn't like the violence..

25363108? ago

stfu you faggot. think it thru. who benefits the most if the cities erupt into firefights? CHINESE PARATROOPERS

25377574? ago

Arguably, they've just seen that even our kids can handle a weapon under pressure, every blade of grass just got scarier

25381053? ago

fair enough... im just saying there's a reason vigilantism isnt legal. obviously what he did was self-defense but moving the overton window closer to "their side is armed so we need to be" isn't the greatest thing. the ideal response is for the feds/nat guard to handle the violence, not private citizens. the whole point is somewhat moot because thats exactly whats happening now, however