Imagine being so stupid you cross state lines with a heavily armed group intending to be 'deputized', then shooting rioters and claiming it's self defense. (QRV)

submitted ago by 3994300?

Now imagine you're an Antifa loser telling QRV how much we should love this retard despite the fact the above is illegal just because he killed some people we don't like. This is a non-violent movement, Kyle is a retard for crossing state lines to go to a riot with a weapon.

High IQ Version

Stickied because fuck you, I can see what you retards are doing. All these comments about how shooting his aggressors was justified. You are right, he would be dead if he did not shoot, but the problem you are happily overlooking is the fact he did not belong there in the first place. The fact he showed up with a group that was denied being deputized by the sheriff and then had to defend himself is not helping his case not look like this outcome was premeditated by him or the influence of the group he was with. Speaking of the group he was with, who the fuck encourages a 17 year old to bring a rifle to a riot zone?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

25356047? ago

"then shooting rioters"

OP deliberately omits the rioters attacking the gunman unprovoked. OP wants to manipulate and deceive you the reader. When did voat let CNN moderate the board?

25369738? ago

mods are kike nigger faggots and support commie jihads https://voat.co/v/QRV/3995146/25364144

25357354? ago

Yeah that's cucked.

25356617? ago

I'm on your side on this, but don't think the term "unprovoked" is the best choice. The rioters/looters were in the act of destroying property and this kid and his fellow property-defenders were there to dissuade that action. Is that provocation? I don't think it matters in the case of self-defense. The very fact that they threatened him with bodily harm justifies him defending himself.

25357864? ago

The left is ALL OVER this case because of this. If they can lock this kid up for life, they know its goning to stop dead the "annoying" factor that good-citizens are leveraging open-carry laws to stop criminal terrorists from burning buildings and terrorizing communities. Which in turn is killing their plans to act as voter intimidation.

Expect to the see the High level organized left and their media gestapo to go after this kid with all their heavy artillery.

25374045? ago

mod is a crybaby https://voat.co/v/QRV/3996082/25373593

25371070? ago

hires a mob who says Dey Wuz Kangz n Sheeeeeit https://voat.co/v/news/3995757/25370910

25371083? ago

HAR NAYUM is sheeeboon nigga? @Splooge

25370496? ago

one rioter was a pedo? https://voat.co/v/QRV/3995727/25370469

25357988? ago

I posted a NYT Twitter thread elsewhere on this thread that gives a pretty accurate, and mostly exculpatory, analysis of the events. I'll post it again here, but it shows, I think, that perhaps the MSM already knows this is a dead-end narrative and that self-defense is pretty evident.

I agree that they'll try, but they've lost the 2nd Amendment argument for a generation at least. We ain't giving up our guns and we're not going to let others loot our property.