You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

24633591? ago

I don't believe the cloning stuff. Maybe body doubles, but not cloning, unless E.Ts are doing that for them.

24633784? ago

They cloned a sheep. It lived for 7 years before being euthanized.

That was back in the nineites, almost 25 years ago.

You don't think it's possible even in the slightest that they could be cloning humans? That's like the Holy Grail for satanists.

24635756? ago

<not OP> Possible, sure. Likely? No. Too much effort and time.

24637846? ago

Aside from cloning and jars, what about just plain old eugenics selective breeding? "Test tube babies" are implanted into surrogates. If you have bloodlines that you would wish to continue, why not?

24642221? ago

"...why not?" Because the planning and resources is staggering. You'd have to chose who to clone at birth. You're assuming you can force the chosen one to follow a particular path AND the clone to do the same. You'd have to hide the clone's progress. It would take a company to manage just 1 individual's cloning operation. It would take that company decades to generate a usable result.

Possible, sure. Likely? NO.

24645048? ago

I said.."cloning aside" and suggested normal IV treatments instead as a eugenics program to continue bloodlines. I agree that "cloning" isn't necessary or likely.

24658543? ago

Sorry, misunderstood. Your scenario is likely.