srsly. and it's the Q team themselves that give ambiguous proofs and then we're not s'posed to go off on false tangents?

that's bullshit. the Q team could also be giving more drops for things that anons can be looking into, as well. more questions that make connections between companies, individuals and events. there's alot more the Q army could be doing to put pressure on the Cabal as far as getting specifics out to normies and bringing dark to light.

for example, out of all the airplane loads of boxes that were taken from the Clinton Foundation, there isn't ONE document that shows something fucked up without jeopardizing the investigation?

we keep hearing PANIC and so on, but there really hasn't been alot of movement indicating widespread panic at the top of the political or celebrity hierarchy. we get dribs and drabs, a couple cryptic videos from a handful of celebs, and are supposed to consider that an indication that major changes are afoot? if some S was really about to HTF, we would've noticed more than a handful of celebs getting the flock out of town. CEO's are resigning, but what about the rest of corporate America's top execs and senior staff? Those CEO's all have sycophants and loyalists within their respective orgs who would be just as dirty as the CEO's themselves. At least some of those lackeys could see if a D-5 was inbound and would act accordingly. But we're not seeing a concurrent rise in VP/exec resignations, are we?

If the central banks and Rotchschilds were really under threat, shouldn't there have been some more chaos and uncertainty in D.C.? Sure, we've had impeachment and some other circuses, but there hasn't been the unsettled-ness between the different bureaucracies, organizations and businesses that are part of The Swamp one would see if there was genuine PANIC among those with REAL power.