Hate to bust your bubble Q but YES. Many of us Patriots DO believe that all the shit we have watched over the last 50 years will go unpunished and scot free. Know why??? Because all of them are scot free. So you want us at the ready?? For what? Tell us WHEN WHERE AND WHAT, we are supposed to do other then sit behind a keyboard and trust the plan. We are not shills and we are not whining. We have seen NO EVIDENCE that these sick bastards are in any danger, our economy is shut down over a fucking flu, and it sure looks like the evil ones have got Trump running in circles for his entire presidency. FISA = Start, GREAT, WHEN WAS?IS that mean? SOON, Like Sessions Soon or 4/10/20 soon?
It is time for confirmations of what we have all hoped for. JUSTICE. PAIN. VICTORY OVER EVIL. Forgive US for being skeptical Q, we are all PATRIOTS, cut us and we bleed American RED WHITE and BLUE. From Arrests or GTFO, to those who are tired of waiting to those of us that are in lock stock and barrel. The TIME for these traitors to hang on the gallows was long ago. Rant over.
view the rest of the comments →
23320833? ago
I understand how you feel, however I think your concerns are misplaced. God loves you, and wants you to be safe and happy. The concerns of this world are just distractions from living your life.
Pray the Rosary. Give your life to God. He will protect you and bring you joys you have never known.
23321648? ago
Please show me the Bible scripture about praying the Rosary or praying to Mary or New Testament "priests", and whether "priests" in the New Testament are expected to be celibate and shun marriage?
23321866? ago
First, I love you.
Second, I realize you hold to Sola Scriptura, however the Church fathers for 1500 years did not, and would ask you to please show them the Bible scripture about only doing things it says to do in the Bible.
Third, if you want to see where it says to be celibate, perhaps this will do to start.
I will say Trent Horn made a great point in his response to Mike Winger about the fact that Protestant priests universally being family men seems quite self serving in the context of the power of a priest and his relationship to his parish. It really does open the doors up for abuses like the polygamy we see in other religions like Mormonism.
Do you know about the apparition of Our Lady of Fatima in Portugal in 1917? What is your Biblical explanation for that?
23322029? ago
Praying to Mary is an unbiblical practice.
Also, having priests is an unbiblical practice, because now Christ is our priest. (At least, in the New Testament. The old priesthood was abolished).
Instead, we have leaders and helpers in the church, and they are instructed to have a wife.
"A deacon must be a man of only one wife and must manage his children and his household well."
If the Catholic church followed this practice, they would not be bringing shame onto Christ with all their homosexual and pedophile priests.
23322247? ago
I love you, however I disagree. Sorry.
I disagree most strongly with the idea that the priests have to be married. It worked for almost 2000 years. The fact that the satanists spent untold sums of money and sent untold numbers of pedophiles into the priesthood, is undeniable. The fact that those priests were protected and many lives destroyed is undeniable. However it does not therefore follow that if they were allowed to marry, they would not have this problem. It is just fallacious logic, and plays exactly into the devil's hands.
A large number of priests, bishops, and even the pope live under strong demonic forces, there is no need to curse them further. Pray for them and their salvation, that they may be healed and brought to Christ, and we might all live together in love for His everlasting glory.
23322337? ago
So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?”
He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:
“‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’
You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”
And he continued, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’ But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is Corban (that is, devoted to God)— then you no longer let them do anything for their father or mother. Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”
23322552? ago
I don't think that proves what you think it proves, especially if you're not going to explain what you think that has to do with what I said. Sorry.
23322599? ago
It's plain as day that God and Jesus repeatedly have warned not to replace the commandments of God with human traditions. Yet this is precisely what the Catholic Church has done, just as the Pharisees had. God commands the priesthood to be abolished and the deacons to have one wife. Whereas the Catholic church institutes a priesthood and prohibits marriage.
23322699? ago
Sorry brother, but you think your tradition is the one we should use instead? I think you are very confused, and pray that you will come to God's Church.
23323914? ago
I have only quoted Bible Scripture here. Is there some Catechism of the Protestant church you believe I am referring to?
23324201? ago
The one that claims, in spite of 2000 years of Church teaching, that Sola Scriptura is a coherent tradition when it's based on the opinions of people who never knew Christ, His apostles, and lived 1500 years later.
Sorry, but I don't recognize your authority to make such claims.
23322726? ago
NO, I am not advocating for any tradition of men, only for what is written in Scripture AGAINST doing that very thing.
23322762? ago
Yes, and that is based on your tradition. I understand, but I disagree.
You cannot get outside of tradition, no matter how hard you try.
23323845? ago
Is there some Catechism of the Protestant church you believe I am referring to? I have only quoted Bible Scripture here.
23323886? ago
Bible Scripture is passed down by your tradition. The reason you accept the (masonic number) 66 books is due to your tradition.
Your argument is self defeating, unfortunately.
23322312? ago
Please name for me a single place in the New Testament that says the church shall have a new priesthood? Even a single priest other than Christ?
There are deacons and such -- that's it. Helpers, not priests. No more intermediaries between man and God. That's the whole reason Christ came. That's why the curtain in the Holiest-of-Holies was ripped in two. That's the whole point Paul made repeatedly in so many writings over and over again.
23322595? ago
Jesus built His Church on Peter. You cannot have a Church without a priesthood.
I don't know what denomination you hold to, but I pray you will learn about the Catholic Church and learn their arguments.
Can you tell me the Catholic Church's argument for their position as well as your argument against?
23323933? ago
Actually Paul says we have an eternal priest: Christ.
Peter says all of us are now a royal priesthood.
The New Testament may have deacons, but no priests.
That was the whole point.
You have no scripture to quote in opposition to this. Therefore what you assert without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
"By their fruits you will know them" -- think of the pedophiles. That is the fruit of Catholic doctrine.
23324184? ago
There are pedophiles in the Protestant church. Sorry, but your argument is poor. You are throwing out 2000 years of Church teachings on what authority, might I ask?
23322671? ago
The whole point is that their traditions are false!
Paul said it best:
If perfection could have been attained through the priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also. He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar. For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. For it is declared:
“You are a priest forever,
in the order of Melchizedek.”
The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.
And it was not without an oath! Others became priests without any oath, but he became a priest with an oath when God said to him:
“The Lord has sworn
and will not change his mind:
‘You are a priest forever.’”
Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantor of a better covenant.
Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them.
Such a high priest truly meets our need—one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself. For the law appoints as high priests men in all their weakness; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.