You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

23303573? ago

Vote by mail. It would be the effective end of actual democracy in the US in favor a completely rigged system where "those pesky plebs" can longer vote for "unapproved" candidates.

THAT is why the Deepstate released a biowepon in Wuhan markets. EVER find it suspicious we just closed the entire world down for a virus that only kills 5% of people already deathly sick? I would understand this lockdown if Corona was as deadly Ebola.

But the entire purpose of the Wuhan bio-weapon is to push mandatory, no-ID, no security, no verification vote by mail. There would be nothing to stop them from flagrantly stuffing ballots.

All I can legally say here is... Patriots need to start buying guns, ammo, and armor while they still can. And don't forget the trauma kits, everybody always forgets to make sure their health is covered in their...ummm...crisis preparations.

23308797? ago

The argument against it being an intentional bio-weapon is that there would have been no way to judge how fast the spread would be or how high the mortality rate would be. That could never be known in advance.

23313351? ago

Yes there would be a very solid guess because the Wuhan lab was doing a ton of research on SARS Corona viruses in humans. Now wxactly how fast it would spread would be hard to guess, but their research likely meant they knew very well about how lethal the virus was, and what could be used to treat an infection.

And so the perfect "false flag" bio-weapon is lethal enough to incite panic, but not so lethal that it starts killing healthy, productive workers 20-55 years old. Also even more perfect if something like HydroChloriQunine effectively treats the virus so the elites know they will not die of the virus even as they try to get the drug banned for use in treating the sick among plebeians.

23315495? ago

What you get in a lab, or computer simulations, is a range of potential outcomes for both spread and mortality rates. As demonstrated by the variance in the "models", that is a very wide range.

Also, since we are in conspiracy theory territory, wouldn't they design a virus that was more deadly to white people, not less?