There were a lot of valid questions and I thought it would be best to sum things up in a new post since that last one went off the rails.
One question that came up was about 2020. There is a common agreement and thought process in Congress that Trump will most likely not be on the ballot in 2020. Democrats are already lining up for a serious impeachment run and most think Trump will resign before he is impeached so he can finalize his new media channel.
The impeachment documents I've seen focus on a few key findings that even Republicans are starting to agree with who both learned valuable lessons from the Clinton impeach. In fact, the people involved with running the Clinton impeachment are now working with democrats to make sure this time it is more than a shaming. The truth is, most thought Clinton would resign in shame back then even though the whole thing started over other criminal activities that never got pushed.
1) Emoluments: Even though this Scottish and Irish Trump sites thing are just now hitting the news, this has been known on the hill and held like a loaded gun for almost six months. The RINOs who don't like Trump are working with the democrats to make sure they don't overstep and can make sure it sticks. The RINOs are terrified of Trump's base and don't want to lose their elections. On top of Ireland and Scotland there is a 1200 page document floating around the Hill that outlines who has stayed at Trump's hotels and how much they have spent. I'm not sure how far something like this can go, but it could be something serious that will be a major news item in about two weeks. Maxine Waters is overseeing this along with Elijah Cummings and we all know how MAGA they are.
2) The NOAA + Alabama thing: There is an email going around that a close aide of Trump's directed Wilbur Ross to go after NOAA to get them to retract that Alabama tweet. It is thought on the Hill that Wilbur Ross will not fall on his sword for Trump. Ross will resign soon.
3) Gerrymandering: There is word on the Hill that the Trump-appointed judges entered their jobs with written or verbal agreements to work specifically for gerrymandering - I personally haven't seen this evidence, but my boss thinks it is very real and a very real threat that we need to be ready for. But, while gerrymandering is happening, the left have big tech spreading out. If you look at where startups are moving from and to, you will see a direct effort to fight gerrymandering that is being mapped out with great precision. This is why startups are moving from LA and SF to Boise, Houston, Raleigh, Jacksonville, etc etc. It's not for tax cuts, they know that with gerrymandering happening, they can hyperlocate people in certain areas and 20 employees can turn a whole area and affect the electoral college at the end of the day.
This is a lot info here that I've been sitting on for a few months. I don't necessarily agree with the above, some of it is rumors and some are actual facts about to be unveiled. I have learned all this from meetings, briefings, and oral memos. I've verified my identity twice now, so I'm not going to go down that rabbit hole again.
I've been active on this board since reddit went down, I am also a major chan lurker, but do not post there since it is blocked at my work and home internet (don't ask). I do not think Q is a LARP, but I also have no idea who it is. I think Q is honest about who they are.
Feel free to ask me any questions, I'll be on this thread for a little while off and on, and will be around most of tomorrow, then I will be deleting my account here and probably not returning, that's why I don't mind being open. I'm sure my identity is known at this point, but I have not shared anything classified as I don't have access to anything classified.
WWG1WGA
view the rest of the comments →
20531165? ago
Regarding Point 1, I came upon the following from July (credit to @kayemsur in the v/theawakening Voat - Trump Wins Big in Emoluments Lawsuits: Two Down and One to Go
How many times do these idiot Democrats want their ass handed to them over and over again?
Not knocking you StaffAnon; thanks for the O.P. Keep up the good work and please try to get information to us in future if you can.
20532159? ago
Those dismissals are based on legal technicalities like inability of the court to provide a proper remedy (i.e. what is the court gonna do, take away his hotels?) and standing (violating the constitution is sort of abstract and it's hard to say who it "harms" besides the citizens in general and you can't just sue on behalf of all US citizens).
Congress wouldn't have such issues in an impeachment hearing as they can just decide to say the president is violating the constitution and they're kicking him out for that. Technically they could kick him out for not liking his hat if they wanted to.
20533060? ago
Technically, you are right Patriot but....................I’ll tell you why these rat bastard democrats will never vote for impeachment. #1: The majority of the American people are against impeaching POTUS. #2: If they do and send it over to the Senate, McConnell will take it and throw it straight into the trash can.
If I was McConnell I would let a trial begin. Now comes DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS, CROSS EXAMINATIONS etc........ The first subpoena I would issue would be to Jerald Nadler and the right down the democrat bastard ladder. Think these pieces of shit don’t know that this outdated be a distinct possibility? A MAJOR FUCKUP and they know it!!!
20534264? ago
They don't need impeachment for that though. Congressional committees and subcommittees have the authority to issues subpoenas and hear testimony at virtually any time. They're not a court and impeachment isn't exactly a trial although there are some similarities.
They can find anyone who doesn't comply to be in Contempt of Congress.
20532653? ago
I guess you're right Anon; I was just trying to be positive here.
If the Republicans in Congress weren't so spineless, then you could say that they would go after the next Dem President in the exact same way. Dems would be playing with fire here. That's assuming there will ever again be a Dem. President. One can hope.