I can't write much right now, but I'll be able to update later today. I wanted to share two things that are very important right now that are freaking people out on the hill. I don't want to tiptoe or mess around, I feel like it's getting to late for stuff like that.
First is this, there is a strong suspicion that it is not what it actually seems and someone in the EU is involved. It may have been a weapons station or something like that. But, Congress is being very quiet about it, but they are concerned.
Second, there is about to be a MASS push to call out as many R members as possible for being racist and it's going to be started by some very well organized celebrities and reporters. This is already in the works but it will come on very suddenly like the #metoo thing. Every R member in congress has their aides digging through their entire past with a finetooth comb to see what can be found if anything. This will be an actual McCarthy-like witch hunt.
Please feel free to call me a shill or whatever, I am just sharing my knowledge with a group of people who have always been positive and worked to do the right thing.
view the rest of the comments →
20518419? ago
Thanks, StaffAnon, keep us updated.
The weight is kind of meaningless when underwater. There is an upward force equal to the weight of the water they displace in volume. That's why boats float, even if they weigh more than 550kg. Not trying to say it is normal, just pointing out that weight doesn't mean anything underwater.
20519471? ago
This may be the single most qtarded thing any qtard has ever said. Fucking wow dude
Are you trolling? You must be trolling.
20520466? ago
Maybe you don't understand how weight works underwater?
Or perhaps you are just an insultbot that just throws insults with no understanding?
20524337? ago
Yeah, I'm the one with no understanding. Bahahaha
20519736? ago
This may be the shillest shill crap ever. Ever wonder why a toddler can move a 2000lb floating dock?
Density clearly matters when determining an object's weight underwater. A fucking rock weighs 1/3 less when underwater because of it's density.
Dumbfuck
20520359? ago
Nope, not trolling. You're actually this stupid.
Next you're gonna tell me you have a degree in physics or hydrodynamics or something, right?
I'm sure a toddler can totally move a 2000lb floating dock with ease. He'll just sling that shit around like nothing, because there's no such thing as inertia anymore!
A fucking rock that weighs 550kg on the surface, assuming it weighs 1/3 less underwater as you say, is still 367kg of "meaningless weight" to maneuver underwater.
If "weight doesn't mean anything underwater", why do so many shipwrecks litter the oceans, never to be recovered? Weight doesn't mean anything underwater! Just send a few guys down there to pick it up and walk it back to shore!
Hey, since weight doesn't mean anything underwater, go for a quick swim and bring me back the biggest rock you can find. Since weight doesn't mean anything underwater, it should be a pretty big rock.
Unbelievable. Please tell me you went to college for this shit so that I may mock you.
20521964? ago
You push a 1000lb sunken lead weight, I'll push a 1000lb floating boat. See who makes it 200 yards first. OK now, dipshit? You think all that inertia is going to stop me? Dumb motherfucker.
You mush be a fag because your cranium is filled with cum from sucking all those dicks.
20524363? ago
DUDE WHAT
You...you just blew out your own argument!
L M A O
M
A
O
If "weight doesn't mean anything underwater" then I should be able to haul ass with a 1000lb sunken lead weight.
20524448? ago
This might be news to you since you're such a dumb twat, but I'm not the original poster and never said "doesn't mean anything". But you're still too fucking stupid to understand how displacement works.
20525074? ago
Oh?
20533737? ago
You complete dumb fuck
20537224? ago
Lol oops
I'll give you that one
20519319? ago
Weight is not meaningless under water. Where did you learn science? Oh, you didn't.
20520496? ago
Weight is meaningless under water. Mass and displacement are what matter.
You could pick up a 2000 lb weight with ease under water if it displaced 2000 lbs worth of water, right. It would be buoyancy-neutral. The weight would be zero. See how that works?
20522028? ago
I can't pick up 2000 lbs whether it's under water or not. If you tie a concrete block to somebody and throw them in the ocean, they will drown. The water doesn't magically make the concrete block weightless. It will drag the person down and they will drown. This is cold, hard reality.
20525352? ago
An Ohio Class submarine weighs 16,750 tons. Put it in the water and it doesn't sink, does it? You put it in the water and it lowers down until 16,750 tons of water is displaced by the hull. It floats. How do you go under water? If you add 2000 tons of water to the ballast tanks, making it weigh 18,750 tons, the sub will finally just barely slip below the surface. It will have neutral buoyancy. It will not go to the bottom, although it may drift there. There is no force making it drift up or down.
20526649? ago
You're a fucking idiot. A submarine floats because it's hollow and mostly air. Fucking dickwad.
20527217? ago
That's exactly what I just said. Not sure what your point is. The dry weight of a submarine when on land doesn't tell you anything with about difficult it is to lift when it is in the water. What matters is the overall density, not the weight. Density is mass divided by volume.
In my original comment, I merely said that the weight of missing object isn't really relevant to the question of whether it could be easily moved. You'd have to know the dry weight and the volume.
20527692? ago
So I said "you're a fucking idiot," and you reply "that's exactly what I just said." I'm glad we're on the same page and can finally agree on something. Have a nice day.
20529889? ago
You too!
20521353? ago
Yup two airbags filled with certain gas attached and a mini sub no issues to overcome. Just need das i.q. Over 12. It was towed to another location.
20518930? ago
Europe Baltic Sea