"The independent inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) was forced to issue an apology following the loss of vital evidence in the case was deleted from their servers."
An apology? WTF? "Oh, we're sorry we deleted an entire database of elite child rapers. Good day sir!"
Anyway, doesn't really matter. I have no doubt all this information is stored somewhere in the USA.
UK Government Deletes Entire Database Of Elite Pedophile Ring Evidence
view the rest of the comments →
20408890? ago
The UK has fallen.
The Jew's own our central bank and our mainstream news media which they have used to successfully implement their Kalergi plan and flood us with inbred jihadists and illiterate Negroes.
Our culture and birthright has been destroyed while the Jews continue to poison our children's minds.
We can't even resist the Jew's invasion or we'll get locked in a prison cage for being a white nationalist.
Please, Americans - I beg you - save yourselves and don't let the Jew destroy your country and enslave your children too.
20410096? ago
What i think you are forgetting. Weve been worse off in the demographic destruction of our nations since its founding. You JUST caught up and are passing us real quick like, but actually in 50 years we have gone from 90% to 60% white. If we are not also already dead we are approaching the point of no return with haste. Or at least no peaceable return that i can advocate for during times of functioning laws.
20415187? ago
We're really not. 87% white vs 56% white. We're nowhere near where you are. Less than 50% of your under 15's are even white (and that's a US census "white" which includes literal black people). One of our worst cities, Londonistan, is whiter than your entire country, at a % level.
No argument about your assessment of your own nations demographics though.
20418095? ago
At the current rate and with your level of govt enforcement of cultural compliance. Your trajectory is more accelerated than ours, from my personal assessment. But hey, lets face it, we are both so fucking fucked.
20425554? ago
But you're literally experiencing migration at a higher rate, and with equivelant governmental and cultural compliance.
American citizens support migration more than any other western country on earth.
Trump himself, your populist deity, actively harps about the glories of "legal migration".
No argument we're both utterly fucking fucked, but seriously, america takes it to a whole special level when it comes to glorifying immigration, and has done for more than half a century
20426016? ago
Yeah but its still legal for us to opose it. You will accelerate faster if i had to guess.
20426179? ago
Perfectly legal here too - it's literally why brexit happened. To give a very brief overview :
UKIP and the BNP (think of the BNP as AfD on steroids, roughly equivelant to the fratelli d'italia in italy, with UKIP being roughly Lega) were gaining an ever increasing share of the vote in elections. Not enough to win many seats, because first past the post, but A LOT. 15% of the entire electoral vote a lot, and climbing every single year. David cameron was afraid, because these parties were stealing their vote almost entirely from the tories - if they continued to grow the tories would eventually lose to labour. As such, he called for the brexit referendum
Here's where things get interesting : despite a whole lot of debate as to who voted for brexit, and why, itd be hard to claim a general anti immigrant stance wasn't a factor. And the results were in the end largely independent of party : almost as many labour voters as tories wanted brexit.
Honestly the UKs entire current political system is largely based on opposing it. Hell, we even have the weirdness of Priti Patel, the indian ethnic home secretary, who's more hardline anti immigration than most any mainstream republican. Brexit continues to be highly popular, and explicit anti immigration stances aren't even close to illegal, let alone general opposition to it.
Marching against muslim rape gangs? That one is more illegal, not going to lie. After all, the (((police))) and (((judiciary))) profit from the human trafficking, so their stance makes sense. But political opposition to immigration is not in any way illegal.
You are correct in that the UK will accelerate faster, but its still left shifted : it's about where the US was some 2-3 decades ago - the difference is, it has a rapidly browning US which remains a cultural powerhouse, whereas the US fell without nearly as much outside cultural (((enrichment))). But that doesn't change the fact that yes, relative to the US at the same point in the curve, we'll accelerate faster.
20428535? ago
Its "legal" but you cant form a good argument without being charged with racism. And yeah it hardly matter in a race to the bottom. Lol
20430007? ago
aye, there's no way left to form a good argument without having accusations of racism thrown around anymore. In almost every instance though it'd end up following a similar pattern to the one it does in most countries in the west, america often included- it's not about sentencing "le ebil racists", except in the court of public opinion. James watson outright pointed out the obvious (and I say that as a biology postgrad) that it seems a reasonable hypothesis at this point to assume blacks have lower average IQs than whites, due to biological (read as : genetic) factors. Was he arrested for racism? Definitely not, that might have woken people up. Instead he merely gets shunned, mocked, becomes a public figure for derision, and a lesson to others who might think about speaking up.
It's so much more effective and insidious than simply locking people up would be sadly.
And truth be told, I see no way out of it. As I said, I'm a biology postgrad - I know a number of other people in the field, from fellow grads to professors. With the exception of a rare, rare few, most are full on libtard retards. We're talking about people who could easily, in any other fucking situation, understand the reality that 2 populations separated for a period of roughly 50,000 -> 150,000 years would undergo deviation in their genetics, in both random directions and functional directions, and that any body part which uses roughly 1/5th of daily calories to operate and is required to perform a huge range of tasks, many of which are climate dependent, would speciate, and would do so on that body part to a reasonably substantial degree. They could understand this concept casually, and to a much deeper level than most all of the people who actually understand the truth of race realism. And yet, the second they realise you're talking about race and intelligence, they practically become creationists. It's a little surreal, truth be told. We're all fucking doomed, there's no way to undo brainwashing this deep. Not without a truly brutal civil war at any rate.