You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

20273924? ago

Most definitely. Look at the bricks to her left side and compare to the bricks on her right side.

20276349? ago

The photoshopping is so painfully obvious that it makes me wonder what else we are missing in this image. OP has cropped the original photo and only showing you half the image.

So here is the actual link to the uncropped original photo: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/08/16/19/17367590-7364957-image-m-113_1565980458923.jpg

 

Now ask yourself why would such a ridiculously obvious talking-point be placed so clearly in the image?

We all know the classic magicians tactic of misdirection. Make your audience concentrate on your right hand, so they completely miss the subtle movements in your left hand.

20276517? ago

Found another photo from a different angle. There was a trash bin behind her right-side that they photoshopped out.

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECdOnB2WsAAaCgO?format=jpg&name=900x900

Note the trash bin in front of the red/yellow IN-N-OUT sign. Now look at the badly photopped one. You can still see the remaining pixels from the base of trash bin, and the beige top half is still intact in the photo.

Doesnt explain why they did such a rushed photoshop, but it is clearly just an ugly trash bin that was removed.

20277747? ago

It was an AI creation of what it 'thinks' the BG should be. It is pebble from the seat created , the brick was re created also.

20278009? ago

AI ??

Do you know what 'photoshopped' means?

20278377? ago

Yeah it's a photo shop ai creation.

Hit this and watch the background (BG). https://bgr.com/2019/02/15/ai-face-generator-looks-100-percent-real/

20278581? ago

Ok that is an interesting link. But it has nothing to do with creating fake backgrounds for photos like you stated.

That ai is just creating random human faces from massive data-sets it has been fed. Interesting, but this is a different topic entirely to OP.

20279490? ago

Ok look at the bricks o. The grout d between the two angles. Distance to the wall is way different. She was not in the same location for both images.

20279350? ago

Here look at the tree, the background creation. It's not an image, it's not even leaves.

http://magaimg.net/img/8seg.jpg

Zoom

http://magaimg.net/img/8sei.jpg

20279264? ago

20278791? ago

Yes it's part shopped and part generated, I am harping on the obvious generations.

20278757? ago

No it does the back grounds too. Look at the crazy pieces of hair N shiet that it creates or the weirded lines I produces. It's the same thing. It's using what it has for textures and using that, that is all and it's obvious and of it not obvious for you, keep learning about artificially produced imaging.

20290548? ago

Yeh ok. Interesting...I guess it couldve been used here.

But whatever did it, that mess was put there to distract us from the real message which is in other parts of the image.

20286105? ago

ummm the hair is on their faces, nothing to do with the "BG". All the backgrounds are just blurry colours with no detail whatsoever.

I hope you arent in IT.... or a bricklayer