You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

19442503? ago

  1. No more government funding for post secondary education institutions.
  2. Your student loan is with the school you are going to. Not with the government or bank.
  3. Upon graduating, the school must place you in a job reflecting your education and at a mutually agreed upon minimum salary. When that has happened, you have ten years to pay back your loan or you default.
  4. You make no loan payments to the school until after you are placed. If the school cannot place you with two years after passing your curriculum and graduation, your loan becomes null and void - too bad school.

This makes the school a partner in your education with skin in the game. So they have to give you a solid education with job prospects upon graduation. No more turning out broke radical left socialist Dem wannabe’s with no prospects in life and an education you could have gotten from a Coles Notes bio of Karl Marx.

So your education has to be a win-win or the school loses the tuition you owed them.

  1. Problem solved.

19480222? ago

Making it the schools' responsibility still misses the point. A person's education should be on his or her own shoulders—personal responsibility. Let free market and supply and demand produce quality in the schools. If a school does not produce, it will lose students. If schools are responsible, then students do not have to work as hard and can shirk their responsibility. Corruption within the schools will happen to ensure students' "success." Studies are out there (do your own research) that show students who work while going to school tend to do better. My take on that is because they are owning more responsibility. Education on that level is not a right but something to be worked for by those who are have the ability to do so. The only exception would be granting aid for military personnel because of what they sacrifice for our country.