I honestly think that true objectivity can only be reached by consensus and that in some occasions one persons bias can get in the way. But others can balance that.

This is why I believe that we need a new process to handle bans and to handle reports of harassment/doxx and so on and so forth. So as a community with the different people and backgrounds in it can grow staidly and that we can be the very thing that other sites want us crushed for: A Free Speech platform.

You may call me an idealist and optimistic prick if you want but you and I know that as Christians we believe in things that many others don't.

@kevdude have never giving me any reason to distrust him, I am amazed that @crensch acted as he did and also to see @Shizy doing it as welll and using technicalities to dodge the real problem. This doesn't mean that I trust them less it just means that I am sorry I can't help them through their pain and frustration.

Hey you didn't even like either one of them but suddenly you start defending them as long as they are against the one that you hate the most. That is convenience and I am against it.

Fuck, if I have to stand in between to reduce the damage I will because I believe in this site even if you lost faith in it a long time ago.

I won't let that happen to me, though I admit sometimes is really hard. @Madworld can also vouch for my sadness at one point.

So Dial... have at it. Slander me all you want, even on an anon sub. I don't mind and if you want me to respond I will but I will keep working for the well being of Voat. That is that. If you don't believe me then well we can only agree to disagree, right?