Anyone who has taken the time to watch Bill Binney knows the DNC server was accessed directly. Download speeds are 4 times faster than what a remote hack (even from data center to data center) are capable of producing. Speeds do match up with a thumb drive - likely done by Seth Rich - for which he was killed.
Nonsense. You CANNOT tell anything about the method of file extraction by examining the metadata of files that were posted live sometime AFTER they were extracted.
If the metadata speeds indicate copying to a thumb drive, you have NO WAY OF KNOWING when that occurred. It could have happened any time after extraction and this is assuming there was only single copy of the extracted files.
Of course you can see WHEN, assuming the computer itself had the correct time set.
The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
view the rest of the comments →
18892032? ago
Anyone who has taken the time to watch Bill Binney knows the DNC server was accessed directly. Download speeds are 4 times faster than what a remote hack (even from data center to data center) are capable of producing. Speeds do match up with a thumb drive - likely done by Seth Rich - for which he was killed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv0-Lnv0d0k
18892129? ago
Nonsense. You CANNOT tell anything about the method of file extraction by examining the metadata of files that were posted live sometime AFTER they were extracted.
If the metadata speeds indicate copying to a thumb drive, you have NO WAY OF KNOWING when that occurred. It could have happened any time after extraction and this is assuming there was only single copy of the extracted files.
18892374? ago
Of course you can see WHEN, assuming the computer itself had the correct time set.
18894776? ago
You can only see the WHEN of the last movement of the files. It tells you nothing about if there were previous movements or multiple copies made.
It's scientifically invalid.
18899739? ago
date might match up with exfiltration, or something
18900378? ago
how do you determine when the exfiltration occurred? You can't.
Not from the metadata