Isn't it incumbent on the investigator to prove the crime? So, in this case the "circumstances" are proof enough for that conclusion, then why cant we say that the circumstances are proof enough that Trump obstructed? You cant change how you prove crimes one minute to the next depending on what you want to happen
But what you DO have to do is investigate the actual crime that the entire Russia Collusion Investigation was based upon--the theft of those DNC emails. Think hard:
Supposedly Russia COLLUDED with Trump by giving those emails that they supposedly hacked from from the DNC to Wikileaks. Mueller never even established that a crime occurred, because he didn't bother to investigate it.
Mueller NEVER sought to prove where Wikileaks got the data! NEVER!
He COULD have investigated the DNC. Why did they hide the server and eventually destroy it when the FBI was going to investigate the "hack"? Why would they hide that, if they were the victim?
Suspicion is, the DNC wanted to BLAME Russia for the "hack" and were afraid an inspection of the server would show that info had actually been downloaded on a thumb drive, giving them a potential motive for killing Seth Rich.
Mueller COULD have interviewed Assange/Wikileaks. Easiest thing to ask in the world. Hey Julian, where'd you get the data?
He was careful NOT to interview Assange, wasn't he?
Afraid of what Assange might say?
Afraid to draw attention to the fact that Wikileaks/Assange, from way out in Australia and London, had enough interest in the murder of Seth Rich to offer a reward for info on his murder? What long distance interest would Assange have in a "nobody" like Seth Rich that he'd offer a reward for info leading to a conviction regarding Seth's murder?
The Russia Collusion investigation was BASED on the theft of those DNC emails, and Mueller never even investigated it!
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein announced the charges at a midday news conference. Mueller, as has been his practice, did not attend the announcement. Court records show that a grand jury that Mueller has been using returned an indictment Friday morning.
The suspects “covertly monitored the computers, implanted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code, and stole emails and other documents,” Rosenstein said. “The goal of the conspirators was to have an impact on the election. What impact they may have had . . . is a matter of speculation; that’s not our responsibility.”
You stupid fuck, that's in reference to the alleged STATE hacks. Of election websites.
The Russia Collusion crapola was that Putin tried to help Trump by hacking the DNC and maybe Hillary's home server, then dump the ugliness through Wikileaks prior to the election.
The supposed elections-site hacks of 3 State elections websites were never in the conversation regarding Trump. Ever.
BTW, If you noticed....NONE of Mueller's indictments had anything to do with Trump/Russia "Collusion", dumbass.
The Mueller report contains new information about how the Russian government hacked documents and emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee .
At one point, the Russians used servers located in the U.S. to carry out the massive data exfiltration effort, the report confirms.
Much of the information was previously learned from the indictment of Viktor Borisovich Netyksho, the Russian officer in charge of Unit 26165. Netyksho is believed to be still at large in Russia.
But new details in the 488-page redacted report released by the Justice Department on Thursday offered new insight into how the GRU operatives hacked.
view the rest of the comments →
18891649? ago
Still beating this drum even though it's been utterly debunked and discredited? Keep on doing you q-tard
18891786? ago
Debunked and discredited? When did that happen? Pretty sure they've just ignored the question.
18891866? ago
Where's the proof it was Seth Rich?
18892046? ago
the circumstances of his death is proof enough
18892147? ago
Isn't it incumbent on the investigator to prove the crime? So, in this case the "circumstances" are proof enough for that conclusion, then why cant we say that the circumstances are proof enough that Trump obstructed? You cant change how you prove crimes one minute to the next depending on what you want to happen
18892732? ago
But what you DO have to do is investigate the actual crime that the entire Russia Collusion Investigation was based upon--the theft of those DNC emails. Think hard:
Supposedly Russia COLLUDED with Trump by giving those emails that they supposedly hacked from from the DNC to Wikileaks. Mueller never even established that a crime occurred, because he didn't bother to investigate it.
Mueller NEVER sought to prove where Wikileaks got the data! NEVER!
He COULD have investigated the DNC. Why did they hide the server and eventually destroy it when the FBI was going to investigate the "hack"? Why would they hide that, if they were the victim?
Suspicion is, the DNC wanted to BLAME Russia for the "hack" and were afraid an inspection of the server would show that info had actually been downloaded on a thumb drive, giving them a potential motive for killing Seth Rich.
Mueller COULD have interviewed Assange/Wikileaks. Easiest thing to ask in the world. Hey Julian, where'd you get the data?
He was careful NOT to interview Assange, wasn't he? Afraid of what Assange might say?
Afraid to draw attention to the fact that Wikileaks/Assange, from way out in Australia and London, had enough interest in the murder of Seth Rich to offer a reward for info on his murder? What long distance interest would Assange have in a "nobody" like Seth Rich that he'd offer a reward for info leading to a conviction regarding Seth's murder?
The Russia Collusion investigation was BASED on the theft of those DNC emails, and Mueller never even investigated it!
18892936? ago
lol wat? You're fucking dim!! He indicted 30+ Russian hackers.
18893214? ago
Idiot. For activities that had nothing to do with the hacks of the DNC or Hillary emails.
The 12 or 13 Russians you speak of were indicted for their supposed attempts to hack into 3 STATE elections websites in Florida, Georgia and Iowa.
If you know enough to cite those Russians, you SHOULD know what they were indicted for, so you are a LIAR.
18893338? ago
You dumb fucking cunt:
That clear enough for you, cunt? lol
18893496? ago
You stupid fuck, that's in reference to the alleged STATE hacks. Of election websites.
The Russia Collusion crapola was that Putin tried to help Trump by hacking the DNC and maybe Hillary's home server, then dump the ugliness through Wikileaks prior to the election.
The supposed elections-site hacks of 3 State elections websites were never in the conversation regarding Trump. Ever. BTW, If you noticed....NONE of Mueller's indictments had anything to do with Trump/Russia "Collusion", dumbass.
18893595? ago
LOL. You’re so fucking stupid.
The Mueller report contains new information about how the Russian government hacked documents and emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee .
At one point, the Russians used servers located in the U.S. to carry out the massive data exfiltration effort, the report confirms.
Much of the information was previously learned from the indictment of Viktor Borisovich Netyksho, the Russian officer in charge of Unit 26165. Netyksho is believed to be still at large in Russia.
But new details in the 488-page redacted report released by the Justice Department on Thursday offered new insight into how the GRU operatives hacked.
18893563? ago
LOL fucking shill Russian faggot trying to spread disinformation.
Keep sucking Putin’s cock, cuck:
https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/18/mueller-clinton-arizona-hack/
“Mueller report sheds new light on how the Russians hacked the DNC and the Clinton campaign“
Read that faggot lol