You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

18892032? ago

Anyone who has taken the time to watch Bill Binney knows the DNC server was accessed directly. Download speeds are 4 times faster than what a remote hack (even from data center to data center) are capable of producing. Speeds do match up with a thumb drive - likely done by Seth Rich - for which he was killed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv0-Lnv0d0k

18892129? ago

Nonsense. You CANNOT tell anything about the method of file extraction by examining the metadata of files that were posted live sometime AFTER they were extracted.

If the metadata speeds indicate copying to a thumb drive, you have NO WAY OF KNOWING when that occurred. It could have happened any time after extraction and this is assuming there was only single copy of the extracted files.

18892374? ago

Of course you can see WHEN, assuming the computer itself had the correct time set.

The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

18893198? ago

The speed of the transfer does not depend on the date. It's relative. The speed is the speed despite the date.

18893972? ago

Correct. However, you can calculate the speed based on the written/modified dates. Example: If the first file was created/updated at 08:25:16 and the last file was at 08:25:18, you can tell the transfer took about 2 seconds. This is how they calculate the transfer rate.