Isn't it incumbent on the investigator to prove the crime? So, in this case the "circumstances" are proof enough for that conclusion, then why cant we say that the circumstances are proof enough that Trump obstructed? You cant change how you prove crimes one minute to the next depending on what you want to happen
view the rest of the comments →
18891649? ago
Still beating this drum even though it's been utterly debunked and discredited? Keep on doing you q-tard
18891786? ago
Debunked and discredited? When did that happen? Pretty sure they've just ignored the question.
18891866? ago
Where's the proof it was Seth Rich?
18892046? ago
the circumstances of his death is proof enough
18892147? ago
Isn't it incumbent on the investigator to prove the crime? So, in this case the "circumstances" are proof enough for that conclusion, then why cant we say that the circumstances are proof enough that Trump obstructed? You cant change how you prove crimes one minute to the next depending on what you want to happen
18892272? ago
I am saying for me it is enough.
18892354? ago
I guess I believe in Innocent until proven guilty.
18892762? ago
I am not talking about the law.
18892816? ago
Obviously. You aren't bright enough.
18893858? ago
talk about LOW IQ! LOL
18893872? ago
I know. That fucking tool tried to argue with an adult then backtracks “I dunno about the law”. LOL. No shit. Kids a fucking dimwit