This submission was linked from this v/QRV comment.

^{Posted automatically (#42658) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

faggot shill

The problem i have with this is that you posted the rules. The rules say he shouldnt make ANY moderation decisions based on any type of compensation or favor... Yet you were the one actually violating the rules by offering friendship that you claim is somehow a valuable thing to have. No, i rather don't like how you actually tried to manipulate him into moderating how you want. Props to the mod. Freedom of speech for anyone. Suck it up buttercup.

https://archive.fo/Gk7sw

The ONLY reason I come here is because it is Anonymous.

Me thinks ANYONE trying to remove anon are in bed with the deep state.

I read PutItOut as very reasonable. FastJack came off as a belligerent asshole. The Q-team are Patriots and are focused, they are not assholes. I do take this as a red flag for this subverse.

People complain all the time about gender wage gap, doesnt meant its real or exists... Team Jack

YOU MAY TAKE OUR LIVES!! BUT YOU'LL NEVER TAKE OUR FREEZE PEACH!!!!!!

I mean, who cares if the guy that owns the fucking site wants shit to change.... He doesn't get freeze peach, only we do.

You fucking losers. Everywhere you all go, you get kicked out.

PROVE IT

Okay if everyone is getting upset about the porn, why not just make one rule? No porn. Pretty simple shit here guys. Then ban the people who post porn. Porn is easily distinguishable from every other form of speech. I do not see people asking for this for people who post things skeptical of Q. I only see people saying this about porn, and more specifically loli porn. Yes, this can still be the "wild west" with a NO CP/Animated CP rule. As someone else in these comments pointed out, even the Wild West had a sheriff. They also had laws against obscenity. In fact pretty much every society has had laws against obscenity and publishing obscenity at one point or another. You make a very specific rule "NO CP/Animated CP" with a narrow scope and you pursue that rule and read nothing into the text that isn't actually there. This is so easy. Yes yes, free speech. obscenity isn't speech though! It doesn't even qualify for first amendment protection.

The mods on these boards are fuckin' retarded, truth be told. I don't want the voat admins to take over either, I'd rather this be resolved from inside this verse, but come on? How fuckin' hard is this? Maybe hold a straw poll? Community engagement is a good way to determine a good course of action.

I agree with PuttitOut. I've stopped participating with this sub because of all the blatant trolling going on. Even the Wild West had a sheriff. The posse shouldn't be able to run through town and shoot out all the windows without recourse. Law and Order is superior to anarchy.

I'm not clicking that link it's probably barnyard porn

I'm with fastjack

This submission was linked from this v/whatever comment by @RM-Goetbbels.

^{Posted automatically (#42393) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

it's almost as if he doesn't want users to know what he is saying.

If I walk into your yoga class and start banging a drum and yelling out filthy jokes, and you kick me out, am I being censored, or are you protecting the integrity of your peaceful yoga class?

I love the freedom of speech inherent to Voat, but there are always limits to free speech, just as there are limits and boundaries to all human behaviour. I'm not free to scream in your face if you're trying to concentrate. I'm not free to yell obscenities at your children while you're quietly reading to them. I'm not free to show porn to your grandmother while she's praying in church.

Some behaviour must be circumscribed. In this case, loli porn does not belong here in QRV. Sure, we downvote and ignore, but why should we not simply turn away this useless content in the first place?

I couldn't care less if people post "Q is a larp" or "Arrests or GTFO". It is everyone's prerogative to disagree, attack, even abuse the sub and its users. But posting pictures of small girls covered in cum is just pointless vandalism. It also diminishes the credibility of the genuine content for new users, and makes us look puerile and unhinged.

I'm with putts on this one.

Puttitout is a shill and THE ZHILLS ARE PANICKING!!!!

I think putts got this one wrong. Leave the sub the way it is. Don't like it? Go to Reddit, don't try to change our place or the way we do things.

Keep things anon.

I'm not seeing any corruption. I'm seeing a dispute over moderation style.

I don't get why there needs to be moderation. This type of site should be the Wild West, as the internet is meant to be.

Learn how to deal with stuff you don't like.

Sounds like the Mods are all SBBH sock puppet accounts who don't give a fuck about the verse. They all came in together and none of them are active users.

I wish the other sub mods would leave QRV alone.

The mods are white niggers. Remove them already.

Use your up/downvoats, anons. The integrity of v/qrv depends on it.

FUCK PUTITOUT.

I hear that these problems don’t exist on POAL

Just sayin

I’m with FastJack on this. Why have a board, if the powers that be can bully their way into taking over? Fuck PuitOut. Reddit 2.0 shit right there.

It's pretty great that @fastjack stood up to that coward putt.