If there is a coverup of RGB's death or worsening condition, there are punitive measures in the law for concealment, false statements, trickery, etc. and someone could go to Jail.
18 U.S.C. § 1001:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive,
legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious,
or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, [and/or] imprisoned not more than 5 years . . . .
B) Analysis and Practice Pointers
Section 1001 makes it a crime to make a false statement“in any matterwithin the jurisdiction of the executive,
legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States.” In corruption cases, it is common for
defendants to attempt to conceal their crimes by making false statements to federal law enforcement officers, to
regulators, and/or on paperwork like campaign finance reports and ethics disclosure forms.
view the rest of the comments →
18796029? ago
A whole bunch of people in Government that know the truth, including Supreme Court Justices, could go to jail.
18796649? ago
Only if they make a statement about it. Have any justices commented on the condition of RBG? Have any of them said that she is physically present? Have any of them stated that they hear her voice on the phone? I suspect that RBG is participating electronically only, and it could be that her staff is doing everything.
18805353? ago
No but the person responding to the email request for information did
18798043? ago
I don't know if they need to say anything at all. "Willfully ... concealing ... a material fact."
18797080? ago
Q proved to us that the corruption of the SC goes far beyond the simulation of RBG's voice on a conference call. Q pointed us to an official recording of a SC proceeding on which RBG was participating remotely. The recording contains audio editing errors in which an exact copy of a portion of a sentence spoken by another SC Justice's voice is present before and after RBG "speaks" during the call. This means they are not just faking RBG's participation. It means they are doctoring the official record of potentially ALL SC proceedings.
I personally believe the reveal of SC *uckery is being saved for last as it will require some form of martial law and transfer of judicial power to the US Military (tribunals).
18796797? ago
Good point. There is a lack of any statement from anybody about her condition (dead or alive). They have not commented on her on the SC website since December 21st. I also noted that CNN has not updated her timeline since December 21st also.
18797537? ago
This is true, but wouldn't the existing supreme Court justices be complicit if they don't speak up about her vote being counted if she isn't present? I am not wondering if she is "working remotely" as another person suggested so the others can hear "her" speaking
18799182? ago
It is the duty of Justice Roberts, because he is the head justice! He has a responsibility to oversee the court and other Justices.