Q3165
[They] thought it was coming last Friday.
Ammunition spent.
Q
Once they realized that they had been tricked, they tried to 'get the ammunition back'. That way, they could use it when the Mueller report really came out.
They wasted all of that emotional video material, all of those talking points from that huge manifesto... They could have cherry-picked from that manifesto for weeks, and never hit the same point twice. (Meanwhile burying the Mueller report.)
They didn't hit the manifesto too hard right after the shooting, because they were hoping to 'recover their ammunition'. But they can't use it now. You can't suddenly start talking about the manifesto more than a week after the shooting. For the ruse to work, the 'outrage' must be immediate.
The sheep have been programmed that way.
Q is brilliant.
view the rest of the comments →
17607994? ago
NZ video could be an insurance policy, he deliberately video'd himself so that it could be proved, e.g. shotgun not blowing windscreen out, that he was not responsible for the actual killings and others were involved.
17610272? ago
17615961? ago
Yup, have a look at this short vid https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=BGORUSUB2H4N
17617194? ago
Man, so many spergs on the internet. He clearly blows holes in his windshield, but people are failing to notice the cracking around the holes blends in with the white hood right behind that camera angle.
As for the grey van, he apparently notices someone (bizarrely behind a steering wheel on the right side), aims his weapon at them, but decides to spare them. They then wisely decide to drive away ASAP.
With the claim of "shooting at nothing up the alley", narrator again reveals he's physically blind, and not very bright. He clearly shoots a person standing there, who then falls over. My theory is it's the guy who crawled out the window at that very spot just as the shooter turned to the left on his last trip into the main room. Did that guy really just hang out outside, waiting to see what would happen?
So, we have some combination of blindness, poor version of the video, low quality or tiny monitor, and a knack for drawing unfounded conclusions based on no or poor evidence.
17620494? ago
Nailed it.
17620589? ago
I'm seeing a flood of these "it's fake or a FF!" videos. Is this the alternative suppression technique? 🤔
17620757? ago
You really have to wonder anymore. Certainly seems a viable option to experiment with for those so inclined.