When people post damning, and real information about the religion of Freemasonry there is almost always somebody defending them by bringing up the Shriner hospitals or trying to pretend the information presented is taken out of context. They will accuse the poster of being paid to push an agenda etc. The only people that would criticize such sharing of information are definitely Freemasons themselves. It is easy to spot them. They get so mad when real information is presented that their anger and arrogamce comes out in their comments.
Just watch this:
Freemasons swear oaths to not threaten each other's life or property. Therefore if a Freemason swindles you or harms you and you are in court seeking damages, and the judge is a Freemason, you will lose because the judge cannot rule against his fellow brother.
When the Freemasons murdered William Morgan they all refused to testify against each other in court and it was so sloppy and obvious that the whole country found out about it and it caused such an uproar that the people founded the Anti-Mason political party. 6th President John Quincy Adams was dragged into the debacle and wrote extensively about this. You can read his letters here:
https://archive.org/stream/Letters_And_Addresses_On_Freemasonry-_J_Quincy_Adams/Letters_And_Addresses_On_Freemasonry-_J_Quincy_Adams_djvu.txt
His letters are a scathing rebuke of their entire religion. Worth a read.
view the rest of the comments →
17071738? ago
I've started to entertain the idea that there are two general groups of freemasons: those who pass the ultimate test and those who don't, I.e. those who spit on the bible and those who don't. There are two paths for each and both exist in the world. Not all Freemasons are privvy to what we think they know...
Just a possible scenario...
17071931? ago
No excuse. I'm not one and I know enough to not have joined, and that they are gnosticism. But there is a secret society within the secret society, that much is true.