This Movement Is Not About Whites Only It's about The Whole World!!!... If You Have A Race Agenda Take It Elsewhere!!! (QRV)

submitted ago by 3046828?

Q2788 >> Excerpt:

Emotionally unstable people are easier to CONTROL.

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED BY RACE.

DIVIDED BY CLASS.

DIVIDED BY RELIGION.

DIVIDED BY POLITICAL AFFILIATION.

DIVIDED AS HUMAN BEINGS.

DIVIDED you are WEAK.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

WHEN YOU ARE STRONG YOU THINK FOR YOURSELF.

WHEN YOU ARE STRONG YOU CHALLENGE WHAT YOU ARE TOLD TO BELIEVE.

WHEN YOU ARE STRONG YOU ARE AWAKE.

WHEN YOU ARE STRONG YOU ARE NO LONGER CONTROLLED.

…………………… TRUST YOURSELF.

TRUST THAT YOU ARE NOT ALONE.

TRUST THAT THERE ARE GOOD PEOPLE RIGHT BESIDE YOU FIGHTING FOR WHAT WE KNOW TO BE RIGHT.

GOD BLESS YOU ALL. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL!

Q

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16883583? ago

Q is for the wall. Q is for preserving American heritage. How you describe American heritage is the question. Up until the 60s it was pretty fucking white.

16884990? ago

The United States was founded as and always intended to be a European ethnostate. Immigration of anyone non European WAS NOT ALLOWED until the Immigration and Nationality act of 1965. The Jews played an outsized role in getting this legislation passed and ushering in the genocide of whites in America.

Don't believe me it was always designed as an ethnostate? Learn your history...

The Real History of the United States https://imgur.com/gallery/fFKkosQ  https://imgoat.com/uploads/4d9ee44e45/198503.jpg  https://imgoat.com/uploads/4d9ee44e45/198504.jpg  https://imgoat.com/uploads/4d9ee44e45/198505.jpg

16887668? ago

Huh. How did we end up with Chinese immigrants who did much of the mining and railroad building in the west if they were never allowed into the country?

Better check your facts because your assertion doesnt pass even a simple observation of history.

16890616? ago

They were only allowed citizenship if born here. Their children were citizens they were not.

There was even debate about this, and whether or not africans and american indians were citizens.

16890780? ago

So... non white citizens? Guess that argues against the racists assertion.

16891533? ago

The fact is, no gook or nigger ever went through ellis island.. And in 1921 maybe 24 they changed the law to limit some European ethnics. Early documents even clearly specify some rights only apply to whites.

As for the chinese citizens, They weren't considered citzens, like american indians and african freed slaves until laws were revised.

Why don't you read the bill of 1964 for yourself see whats in it and then you can come educate us dumb rednecks. Non-whites had some paths to citizenship but not the same as whites.

16894728? ago

They have the 14th amendment. Whites are supposed to be covered in Article IV if I remember correctly. But, since birth certificates and social security #'s we all claim to be citizens of Washington, DC, US Inc.. State Citizenship has been all but abolished.

16889501? ago

How did we end up with Chinese immigrants who did much of the mining and railroad building in the west if they were never allowed into the country?

They weren't considered humans back then, they were just soulless animals. It is said that when talking about the Canadian Transcontinental Railway, "There is one dead Chinaman for every mile of track."

After expendable soulless labour wasn't needed anymore, Chinese immigration was almost completely halted until the immigration laws changed in the 60s and 70s.

So my question to you is - If Chinese/Asian immigrants were always welcome, then why was immigration from there severely restricted leading up to the 60s and 70s?

16889780? ago

"They weren't considered humans back then"
Reminder: that's an intrinsically Judaic concept, not a truly Christian one. And they feel the same way about everyone except their own. (And even their own are expendable whenever necessary.)

16888859? ago

They were brought in as cheap labor by people who didn’t give a shit about the american spirit. Even so, they were a tiny share of the population and so nobody thought it was a big deal. And it wasn’t. As evidenced by the fact that country was still 90% white a hundred years later.

16889232? ago

And yet it still proves your assertion is full of shit.

16890023? ago

No it doesn’t.

16890769? ago

Go home you racist asshole. Your bs isnt wanted here.

16892579? ago

So let's import 100 million non whites?

You stupid fuck that would destroy the country.

16892730? ago

How do you come to the conclusion that is what I want?

This is a fascinating exercise in Poe's law. You are either a shitty human being or you are a paid shill who is posing as one. Either way, its clear you are just a sad and pathetic example of humanity

16892863? ago

No, your ignorant of history. Your fee fees of me make no difference to the facts you Boomer pussy.

Babylon if your religious. The fall of Rome. The Balkans... You cannot maintain a society without cultural cohesion. Sure some can assimilate but they assimilat BRCAUSE they are forced to due to said dominate culture.

None of the brown hordes comi gherw are assimilating unless there is gibs to be had.

I would bascially call you a peice of shit for wanting to destroy the country. You should know better.

And by the way the UN defines replacing a native population via immigration genocide.

America used to be 92% white. It's now 62. This is how wars start. And it will happen.

16895217? ago

You conflate cultural cohesion with racial purity.

The first American to die in our revolution was a black man.

Fuck off you racist piece of shit.

16896377? ago

Yes I do conflate it. Becuase there is a correlation. Try harder.

Blacks have a place here you stupid fuck. Everyone leaves until this place resembles a country again.

Who died doing what and when doesn't change anything. Back to the house with that basic bitch shit nnnnguy.

16896761? ago

This place is a great country already and it can always be better. But not by the means or measurements you are applying.

16893588? ago

You cannot be taken seriously, you are an idiot.

16894124? ago

Any moron knows borders are required to maintain a country.

I see you.

16895185? ago

I have never suggested that we should not have them nor that we shouldn't control who crosses them.

Do you enjoy arguing with straw men or are you just a fucking moron high on the scent of your own farts?

16896458? ago

So we are in agreement.

America needs to reverse its demographics

16896720? ago

Go away troll, we are not in agreement.

16911111? ago

So no wall?

16913334? ago

Where are you getting that from?

16914205? ago

Stop defending the lefts charges of racism.

Just them do it.

16914601? ago

You aren't even making any sense. Is your scripting broken you poor NPC bot?

16892066? ago

Your facts aren't wanted here. They disturb my boomer fantasies.

16886888? ago

European includes Hispanic, Slav, Greek and Bulgarian right?

16892555? ago

All but Hispanics.

Some are fine but we have to remain majority white. More the our current 62% for sure. 80 to 85 would be ideal

16903345? ago

Do you mean that people from Spain are not European? Or do you mean that they are not 'white'? Or both. What about Catalunyans, Galicians and Basque? (Most of those folks look whiter than Joe Genova.) I think that's an impossible line to draw. Your proposed numbers may be perfectly reasonable but could never be implemented.

16891954? ago

Africa

16891577? ago

Not really, there were quotas on Eastern Europeans as well.

16922011? ago

Eastern Europeans were called 'Bohunks', a reference to Bohemia and Hungary.

16927225? ago

You learn something new every day...

16887001? ago

Hispanic means Spanish mixed with nigger and Indian

16903171? ago

so you are saying that being 'Hispanic' is based on language usage, and not ethnicity? write your own special dictionary - freedom of the press and all. many would rather turn to the American Webster's or English Oxford dictionaries.

16910559? ago

Hispanic has two major components in every dictionary. Spanish speaking and Latin American. It DOESN'T mean from Spain, it means specifically a latin American mutt (niggers and Indians) that was conquered by Spain. Stop trying to play gotcha games.

16911966? ago

By that definition the Seminole of Florida would be considered Hispanic.

Hispanic adjective

His·​pan·​ic | \ hi-ˈspa-nik \

1 : of, relating to, or being a person of Latin American descent and especially of Cuban, Mexican, or Puerto Rican origin living in the U.S.

2 : of or relating to the people, speech, or culture of Spain

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Hispanic

This popular dictionary, the American classic, says "of or relating to" things of Spain. The word is first known to have been used in English in 1584, in the second sense seen below. Whereas Latino refers only to Latin American things and was not used in English until the 1940s, adapted from the Spanish language term Latino-Americano. There is a real distinction but some overlap. Many do use the terms interchangeably, while others would rather their language and identities weren't muddied with what you call niggers and Indians or anything having to do with old Mexico. The territory of New Mexico was first 'settled' by people from Spain who never settled anywhere in Latin America and had no intermixing with natives and had no involvement with African slavery. Many were granted land by their sovereigns, the various Kings Philip of the house of Hapsburg who dominated Europe in that era. These settlers established the Capital, Santa Fe, in 1610, a full decade before the Mayflower crossed the Atlantic. There are families in the same territory today who do not consider themselves Latinos in any way. The Webster dictionary quoted above confirms that distinction.

Or should we defer to the ostensibly superior OED?

16914413? ago

The real world is a lot messier then dictionaries, encyclopedias, or even non fiction novels can handle and you can't undervalue sweeping stereotypes -such groupings necessarily enable human cognition. Our brains cannot make effective decisions while maintaining the voracious specificity that modern inclusiveness and individuality demands.

Although I'm naturally racist and so is she (and you), I just fucked a super hot Brazilian black chick 4 times last night. I think she is the primary distinction between Latin American and Hispanic. Brazil was a Portuguese colony. She's certainly not Hispanic but you could call her Latin American. Similarly there's some French cultivated niggers and Indians down there too.

She's superhot and not "dumb" but I certainly wouldn't trust flying in a plane anyone from her family engineered.

It gets really hard when you include the Hispanics from the islands. They aren't even in any " America" thus the need for Latin American vs Latino. Hispanic actually comes from the Isle of Hispaniola but what about the French Hatians!? People would look at you cockeyed if you called them Hispanic even though they're more Hispanic than any Latin American.

It's exhausting but no matter how you look at it people living in Spain do not call themselves Hispanics.

16924462? ago

Most of what you say is fair, maybe even true.

Hispanic may be from Hispaniola which comes from the Latin for Spain.

If the Gulf and/or Carribean islands are not in the Americas, is Ireland in Europe?

I didn't say that citizens of Spain call themselves 'Hispanic'. They have Spanish words for such things.

Yes it's exhausting or complex. Look at the variety of ways people use the words English or * American*.

Somebody was making some claim on a basis of ethnicity using fuzzy terminology. Even if race was the primary way to determine social/political decisions (doubt it), any case to be made has to be made using mutually understood vocab. Why not get clarity and precision up front?

16930286? ago

You called people from Spain Hispanic . It's wrong on many levels. It's like trying to call the CEO a contractor . Sure you can do it with some mental gymnastics but it's wrong and you don't fucking get it

16935796? ago

I'm with Webster's

16936629? ago

Nice to meet you. Please pay attention to the views addressed on this site. It is a rare unfiltered public forum. The views you get here will be closer to what sincere people really believe without fear of retribution. Publications like Webster's are of a leftist slant because everyone in our society is afraid of the PC wrath. PC does not mean correct, it means politically correct. Since leftists are domineering and censor diverse ideas, anything PC will always have a leftist slant.

16936957? ago

I thought Noah Webster was an American genius and patriot.

16937028? ago

Everything gets corrupted by leftists overtime if you don't protect it

16938001? ago

every earthly thing gets corrupted, sometimes by leftism. if you can't protect you gotta renew. including language. if the issue of race is so important, then it deserves the rigor that is reasonably applied to scientific and legal things (and Scriptural things). getting us all speaking the same language with shared definitions is a good way to start focusing on any issue. i don't care so much which definitions are used as long as they are clear and mutually accepted by the party's involved. when discrepancy arises a referee or reference is useful. maybe there is a better reference than Webster's. can you suggest one?

16912558? ago

What are you trying to prove ? A white Spaniard from Spain would kick your fucking ass if you called him a Hispanic. Fuck your dictionary cherry picking ass. Reality trumps leftism's nigger washing of history every time.

16913723? ago

Okay go talk to the Sandoval family of the San Luis Valley and ask them which they would prefer to be called. I've known them. They schooled me on this years ago.

16914593? ago

They don't dictate any narrative because there's not enough of them. Humans just aren't good enough to get it that correct. They'll just be pissed off that everybody gets it wrong in their specific case forever.

16924483? ago

Okay. And your family can't speak for whatever ethnic group you belong to.

N.B. People in Spain don't wouldn't the word 'Hispanic' because it is not a Spanish word. But they could decide if it was acceptable if they knew clearly what it means. The second Webster's definition would probably be acceptable.

16930211? ago

Now I know you're just full of shit and can't handle being corrected

16935807? ago

Webster's

16886859? ago

shoulda put European in the constitution. we hardly got Christian in there.

16892609? ago

The naturalization act of 1790 states exactly this.

This should be revisited.

16903365? ago

So Hispanic Europeans are okay, but Arians from the middle east, and Caucasians from the Caucuses are not?

16887243? ago

Christian or God is NOT in the constitution

16903232? ago

Correct, I think. But our 'Creator' is in the Declaration of Independence. How many belief schemes have a singular Creator of humans who gives us certain abstract qualities?

16891607? ago

Doesn't need to be. Everyone was a European Christian.

16886068? ago

Thank god we got some actual anons around

16887593? ago

No shit. I just "SHILL" screamed at me for pointing out facts like that