You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16323307? ago

Lol. That last signature does not look remotely like the first three. WTH, indeed.

16325788? ago

The first three are all the same signature.

16330639? ago

The angle of the stem on the y seems at slight variance for all three. The angle.

You can imagine she's signed her signature so much, positioning would often be the same. But the angles vary in certain places.

But, to really know, we need source. The graphic itself is a little bit too close to fake news to be credible.

And yet so many people go nuts over this kinda stuff without credibility.

Some folks are woke, but still so gullible......

16331504? ago

You’re so right, and this is exactly the sort of thing that we need to be extra careful about.

16330421? ago

1 and 3, maybe, but 2 has slight differences especially in the way the capital N is slanted. 4 is totally different.

16330584? ago

Yes, four is totally out of whack with the slant, but some similarities remain. Would be interested in a real expert’s opinion, because that’s the real question.

16326331? ago

Uh. No. They are different. You are retarded or blind. Likely both.

16327079? ago

these match in the first three: N A N C Y P E L O S I

16326609? ago

They all even have the exact same imperfection black dot in the middle of the “l” in “Pelosi.” Geez. You need to pay closer attention to details before outing yourself as a moron.

16326827? ago

Except the first "l" doesnt.

16327105? ago

You’re right! And I see the “H” is different on that one, too.. Curious it goes through the same spot. That means the first two are auto-signed and the third one was a copy of the auto-signed second one.

16326265? ago

Prob a stamp or computer generated

16326321? ago

No, it’s the exact same signature copied three times.