People. People built this country. Of all colors and creeds in varying proportions. America is an idea, not a race. True Americans are bound by common ideals, not a skin color. I believe in merit and judging people on actions. There are bad people, judged by actions, of all colors.
The constitution mentions blacks are 3/5th of a white (and i think truth be told, they were being rather generous). It also mentions women were under no circumstances allowed for vote.
I'm all for your non racially nationalistic old style constitution governance, but can we at least go back to what was truly original? Blacks are legally subhuman, and women are banned from voting. In return, no "white" component to the nationalism. Fair trade?
I’m not making you any deals. The 3/5ths clause was an effort to move towards an end to slavery in the climate as it was. It actually empowered the black population comparatively. It was by no means meant to classify them as subhuman. Oh, and good try trying to shoehorn sexism in with your racism there, just digging a deeper hole. White Nationalism isn’t supported by Q or by me, ergo, you are a shill?
I'm sorry dude but this is literally historical revisionism. Lincoln wanted the blacks to be sent back to Africa (see : liberia), and the founding fathers absolutely did not want women voting. It's not "sexism", or if it is the foundational and ideological underpinnings of your constitution are sexist. I could hardly be accused of shoehorning it in when its the original text of the document that suggested this
Or are you saying the founding fathers were shills, or Q is somehow a better voice of reason than they were?
view the rest of the comments →
16282248? ago
Take out one word and I'll agree with you. "White". I'm ok with nationalists, but not associated with any race.
16282438? ago
Who do you think built this country?
16284212? ago
People. People built this country. Of all colors and creeds in varying proportions. America is an idea, not a race. True Americans are bound by common ideals, not a skin color. I believe in merit and judging people on actions. There are bad people, judged by actions, of all colors.
16284307? ago
Immigration Act of 1790: Whites Only
16284405? ago
Point? Did the people who immigrated in 1790 build the entire country?
16285731? ago
The constitution mentions blacks are 3/5th of a white (and i think truth be told, they were being rather generous). It also mentions women were under no circumstances allowed for vote.
I'm all for your non racially nationalistic old style constitution governance, but can we at least go back to what was truly original? Blacks are legally subhuman, and women are banned from voting. In return, no "white" component to the nationalism. Fair trade?
16286644? ago
I’m not making you any deals. The 3/5ths clause was an effort to move towards an end to slavery in the climate as it was. It actually empowered the black population comparatively. It was by no means meant to classify them as subhuman. Oh, and good try trying to shoehorn sexism in with your racism there, just digging a deeper hole. White Nationalism isn’t supported by Q or by me, ergo, you are a shill?
16291283? ago
I'm sorry dude but this is literally historical revisionism. Lincoln wanted the blacks to be sent back to Africa (see : liberia), and the founding fathers absolutely did not want women voting. It's not "sexism", or if it is the foundational and ideological underpinnings of your constitution are sexist. I could hardly be accused of shoehorning it in when its the original text of the document that suggested this
Or are you saying the founding fathers were shills, or Q is somehow a better voice of reason than they were?