You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

15588136? ago

Daily Crusader = Instant downvote

15590404? ago

Maybe so, but the substance is what's important. If the substance can't be verified, and the source is not credible, then it should be ignored. If it can be verified from other more credible sources, then those other sources should be cited.

The article is not coming up for me, but the title of this thread is wrong. The August 302 is not illegal. It was Strzok reciting what he remembered from the Flynn interview. They probably did this because they did not want anyone to see the original 302 filed in January.

You could say it is "illegal" in the sense that Mueller is trying to engage in fraud on the court. The judge isn't stupid, though. But is the judge honest? We'll find that out this week (maybe).

15590742? ago

It's illegal in the sense that a 302 is supposed to be filed within 5 days, and MANY cases have been thrown out if the 302 was filed over 72 hours after

15592317? ago

OK, fair point. And they filed the AUG 302 like a month later, right?

15592558? ago

No it was filed SIX months plus later by Strzok, just four days before Strzok was fired and about 1 month after Strzok was hired by Counsel