For those of you who feel impatient, waiting for indictments to kick in on a large scale, for those arrests to finally happen - here is what I recommend: take a few days off from all media, including Q drops and Q boards. Take a mental break and do what you normally do, what keeps you occupied. Don't talk about Q with anyone. Just keep to yourself. Then come back a few days later and you will see how quickly changes are happening/shifting to obliterate the DS. You can't see the hurricane from the inside out after all. The media narrative is changing in almost imperceptible, minute ways against the establishment/status quo, seemingly unrelated arrests are being made and so on - but you need distance to connect those dots from the bird's eye view since the DS web is so vast.
view the rest of the comments →
15425621? ago
The ONLY way to "obliterate the DS" is to arrest them and execute them. Talking about doing all that stuff isn't action. Thinking about all the cool stuff we are going to do in the future isn't action. The only thing that is ACTION is stopping them. Physically stopping them. Arresting them. Putting them in restraints. Taking them to prison. Executing them. Nothing else is action. Everything else is just talk and words. We need less talk and words and more ACTION. We need to see the Deep State being taken out.
15426777? ago
AND EXECUTED.
No prison sentences, no pussyfooting around. They are enemies, they will die. Anything less is cause for armed insurrection and the installation of a new leadership that will ensure death is dealt to those who have earned such a grave punishment.
15427315? ago
What's a worse punishment for someone used to a lavish lifestyle, dying peacefully or slowly rotting in a prison cell in solitary confinement?
15431238? ago
What's a worse punishment for them? Dying slowly, peacefully in a prison cell, or being burnt at the stake?
Lets not pretend just letting them live out their days is the most we could make them suffer. Let them burn
15431388? ago
As badly as I want to see them hurt for all suffering they've caused, we should not stupe to their level. We are humane and just people.
What happens to the people on our side if we lose control again and we've burnt them at the stake? Torture chambers for the rest of their lives? Playing their game just escalates things and makes it worse.
The rule of law will prevail.
15431561? ago
I don't think you're thinking logically. You speak as if our actions against them, if we failed to retain control, might lead to punishments for us?
couple of problems with that :
They are already so angry that if they every regained power we would all suffer anyway
They were already planning to kill most of us, in gruesome ways, anyway
They were already doing this before we even did anything
If they're left alive, it is indisputably, without doubt easier for them to regain control - simple fact that people still alive can still take actions - lets see a charred corpse regain their former seat of power and seek retribution
Since i've already pointed out (through multiple routes) that they were going to make us suffer anyway, we should consider whether or not agonising death might serve as an effective deterrent. I think the answer is an easy yes. Many of these people took their actions out of greed, minor maliciousness, or other such actions. Even among this group, not many are truly evil. They are merely weak. So do i think a truly horrific punishment might help deter others in future? I'm going to be blunt - yes. Yes I do, and yes it would.
You speak of being "just" and "humane" - would it be just and humane to permit even a chance of what these monsters have done to be repeated? I think the answer is obviously not. On that basis alone, + the above points, they should die in agony. Furthermore, to punish those who have caused this suffering to the most evil in society would not, in any way be EVEN VAGUELY stooping to their level - it's honestly a little insulting (both for me and its implications on your own intelligence) to suggest this is true. They tortured and raped children. Killing them is a mercy. Killing them in agony is perfectly reasonable and rational response
The rule of law is demonstrably a joke. These monsters have made a mockery of it, and even now stand protected by it, allowed a last couple of years of freedom just so people try to do things "by the book". Tell me - how many children have died because Q et al feel they wish to / need to do things by the book? How many have been raped?
It's more than 1, isn't it? Be honest with yourself, you know damn well this is true.
Those deaths, that suffering, ALL OF IT, is on the hands of "the rule of law". Fuck it, and fuck anyone trying to claim it's moral. Let them be cleansed with fire, and maybe the agony they suffer will go some way towards finally allowing these people to repent.Nothing else will suffice.
15431846? ago
Are you saying every single person on this earth who commits these type of crimes should pay for it by having an agonizing death?
Do you really think that would deter these people? I don't. That would only strengthen their resolve to avoid getting caught.
There's a good reason we have the laws and justice system that we have. The problem is that we got complacent and let these people slowly take over and slowly change things in their favour, inch by inch.
I agree these people should die or spend their lives in prison, but dying a horrific, tortuous death is ridiculous, and throwing in an ad hominem because i disagree with your line of thinking is not what id expect from a true truth seeker.
This world would have burned down years ago if someone like was in charge.
15434522? ago
do I think everyone who acts as part of a large scale organisation that rapes and murders children on an industrial scale should face agonising death?
Um - yes?
do i think that it would deter people joining this kind of organisation if this was widely known?
Going to say yes again. On what basis would you say no? death by fire is one hell of a deterrent. In what possible way would your approach be more of one? at best you'd be arguing it was ineffective as a deterrrent, and I'd beg to disagree. Pain is one hell of a motivator, even a laughably trivial knowledge of psychology and/or animal training would tell you this.
And yet, it's widely populated with people who think like you. And look where that got us - right at the bring of distinction. No. I'm sorry - consider the ad hominems unfounded if you like, but our society needs more reliable suffering for those who commit the worst crimes, not less. We can both surely agree that preventing recidivism is not the aim here, yes? The aim is preventing those who might carry out the crimes from doing so. How would a lighter punishment structure in any way aid this?
How, exactly, is a painful death for those who commit the worst crimes imaginable even vaguely close to sinking to their level?
How, exactly, is killing people who commit these crimes as quickly as possible in any way more likely to cause a recurrence of these same crimes? Even leaving aside the agonising death part, surely you'd agree that 100% of these "people" receiving a free bullet to the head would go a significant way towards limiting their ability to carry these crimes out again, or even the chance of these organisations ever regaining power? Even this overly merciful route is still "unlawful". How exactly do you square this circle?
Following the "lawful" route, may salve your conscience, but it does nothing to prevent future crimes, it does nothing to prevent the crimes happening again (nor retribution for the response to them), and it in no way involves sinking to their level.
Even without ad-hominems, your argument is flawed.
People like you are, and have been in charge.
And look where that got us.