I know we've all had enough of this subverse drama. I'm fine with the /s/greatawakening "set" solution. It helped lot. I just wondered if anyone knows why the voting patterns are so different in the two subverses.

Look at SerialBrain2's user page. His highest rated comments are all in /v/theawakening and his lowest rated comments are all in /v/GreatAwakening.

That is really strange and it smells like some kind of shill op. Some of his stuff is really good, but then he goes off on crazy wild speculative tangents and never questions his absurd connections. He suddenly becomes absolutely certain that every coincidence he discovers is 100% proof that he has cracked the code. It doesn't seem remotely logical. It doesn't seem real. His fans don't seem real.

Point any of this out in /v/theawakening and you will get downvoted to shit and then swarmed with apparent morons who all say the same scripted deflections about not being smart enough to understand his decoding. On /v/GreatAwakening, these criticisms are upvoted and the conversation seems more natural.

For the record, I'm not against speculation and attempts at decoding. Have at it. My problem is when that speculation is elevated to unassailable truth without serious scrutiny. I have seen several threads in the shill home base /r/politics that gleefully refer to SerialBrain2 as somehow representative of the entire Q movement. Oh how they laugh. Rightfully so, some of that shit is so fucking stupid it makes my brain cry. He isn't helping the movement. His conclusions in the decoding parts of his post are shit. All he does is give the shills fodder to make us look crazy and perhaps mislead some simple-minded people who are unable to think for themselves.

Has anyone is noticed this? Any thoughts as to what is going on here?