You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

15259221? ago

In your link on Sumer.... r they saying that the Akkadians were there before the Sumerians? And if not, then where did the Akkadians come from? They didn’t just appear so that means that they can’t be the first, that they must’ve come from somewhere else, same with Sumer. They claim that the Sumerians had to move inland after the flood. So the Sumerians had a civilization in tact prior to the one that history is recording as the first. How do we know how advanced they were? Hypothetically they could’ve more advanced than we r today?

15259340? ago

You are starting to think clearly.

So why create a false narrative about sumer and the sumerians? What group of people would benefit from the world being trapped into a 12,000 year memory span most of which originates with the story of the first temple? Why credit written language as only being 4,500~ years old? Who benefits from hiding the fact that present humanity is a rebirth of what came before?

15259583? ago

I got the initial impression that the Akkadians may have hijacked the sumerian culture? Simply because of the way wiki gives us the info. They never really explain the Akkadians and where they came from. I went even further to the wiki on the Akkadians and again it’s not clear who they r or where they came from? I believe that there’s more digging to be done on Akkadians?

15260241? ago

Everything that came before < Semites.

This recognition is the key.